Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1590660ybl; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 21:09:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTG+irFcBcq7cls/wXnaqOB9VsdigcrNDdNmu84jjGHfwDmtJwb2+i6JQTTxpYnT4oTe7j X-Received: by 2002:aca:b808:: with SMTP id i8mr1716638oif.66.1578546574878; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:09:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578546574; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mwFRl6mkQTwjUmH/VpdfPgsH/caCRqk+MDnMaPtCbvHOvsq0vgD4wcAg3Qv+0FpH8G 2jzhvnYwd28iOiHvsRxElaOQKTs5ECGNMlqsHMEYMyUa916fr+eQl9LK/A+0/tNJYm99 4xwdq+actAL5SGkKPY9rMF4JK5QCxu+UvQcCdgT8BBYyHxq9cwJoOoikINN3B3pw+iql D7t8VlWXcyjfZC6CJdLtYI7sikHjkG8CxLeOdLWtkvnCCHMjZ1tWfPizRBsO/B02E6Bg wjLlS3u3Cx/pH7x8I93Uqethn0uwuxyivyAZFFGS7p7pDXwaQTLK2SZJyCnuJCQBP7Q9 TvHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=7F36F1Q493K/paVZPQRcS05hLEfDVY+On7TGwyyQJs8=; b=acHcmNKirLuewZvTNALKXvldiEmI4sMb59GvVPuJoN+6gWJMSAkpMLRZSYhlq3+H4k fuqktiqeiPQKrsvaoKegqe6QeUtnNBc/GPCQeq7uqSe3qGFuAiMScnXzoK+sYiF0VTTX U7muH3ip4mnQE1Ah1yJniij7NNxLHA5n5oqNwfd4uz6Ggj1tq7NKE3C/6i5rcFpnpN6i DuMZcwTIPukDx4xTAMpqyQETpSBkPimh2sQDE8jUYWjnQDhnrUC/9jxxxlodHieNk3Yl 4lbzbN0O7vizkZPjNqZRNb65HE2ytCcWhN/C4AQhBC9Pg0IAvoFsvTw7o4gfhFuXLXoZ F3/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y18si2962202oix.27.2020.01.08.21.09.22; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:09:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726267AbgAIFHd (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 00:07:33 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:44592 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726121AbgAIFHc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 00:07:32 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0094qP5T041057 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 00:07:31 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xde0pe6uc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:07:31 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 05:07:28 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 9 Jan 2020 05:07:25 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00957OP652887766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 05:07:24 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1387FAE053; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 05:07:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA146AE056; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 05:07:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.236.182]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 05:07:22 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys From: Mimi Zohar To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, matthewgarrett@google.com, sashal@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:07:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200109024359.3410-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20200109024359.3410-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20010905-0016-0000-0000-000002DBC5B5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20010905-0017-0000-0000-0000333E435A Message-Id: <1578546442.5147.37.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-08_07:2020-01-08,2020-01-08 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001090044 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 18:43 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: > Changelog: > > v8 > > => Rebased the changes to linux-next > => Need to apply the following patch first > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20200108160508.5938-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/ Unless you made some other changes, the previous version of this patch set is already in next-integrity-testing.  There's no reason to re- post these patches again, and definitely not against linux-next. Mimi