Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:10:38 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To:     madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com
Cc:     dennis.dalessandro@intel.com, mike.marciniszyn@intel.com,
        dledford@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        joel@joelfernandes.org, frextrite@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: hw: hfi1: verbs.c: Use built-in RCU list
 checking
Message-ID: <20200109181038.GA24939@ziepe.ca>
References: <20200107192912.22691-1-madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
 <20200107203354.GD26174@ziepe.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200107203354.GD26174@ziepe.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:38:50PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com wrote:

> Alternatively, it can be lockdep_is_held(ibp->rvp.lock).
> Please refer to the macro(link below) and let me know if the usage of lock_is_held()
> in the patch is correct.

lock_is_held is the normal way to write this

Jason