Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Implement a DVB Dummy Tuner
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc:     sean@mess.org, tglx@linutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <20200109152408.919325-1-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com>
 <20200109170750.12746fcc@kernel.org>
From:   "Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <aedc52d8-db98-eeac-c519-a4eeb21fa9dd@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:51:20 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200109170750.12746fcc@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mauro!


> No need for a patch 0/1. If you want to send just one patch, just sent it
> directly as:
>
> 	[PATCH] foo

I planned on adding more commits to this series in v2, v3 and so forth 
so they would be applied in order, since they would be touching the same 
file. Likewise, the changes could be reviewed in a piecemeal fashion 
making it easier for reviewers. Is this not advisable?

Anyway, thanks for the heads up.


- Daniel.