Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2454151ybl; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:04:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyvQB8i3Kxz1V5dAxNoW4TxI/gv74p1y0je4B21JVcCuPGFhyLRRNqW0zss5L8SktlDYoPi X-Received: by 2002:aca:4fc2:: with SMTP id d185mr4854834oib.33.1578603870775; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:04:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578603870; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fJpEN8RLofRcR4wMgXmTqtIEw4RFSnMOVHBan6L8SgADxEO9i2x6oWStBoS2ahPnq8 IMEdV14GgCRJg5UIz4TLrwTCtadv8AVzFUNaC9XU1XJsGFpehmoZjbbXlrIGj3pKpNiw PtN2NDIBVCYXgxR0wPmeN0/1Sthz4yFVT116G5Vi3QjG+JeeM5VQYmjXFmXlUjMaqxVj xVAxZfMulOeMqhy1YgawQAYogvz//LDgMOofMbcXZ6xL0IWyH3/g94/TrtQ1Jl6ztHm7 KhVMuwGsV2Zmw6RaQUg0FlVVcVkX4Qal0nGP0PA+eG6ac3Mp2fONl6muFO9agC30r/B5 fWkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=GelNvafakcQ6Cz60o4T1wbJYHfiZAx8JB58zfdPpHSk=; b=PbOUOhArKM5MfRfk7xUkzikQO/x7t0nhRBL+hWiilJ9X9xj5TM/sdqAD95qPE1OoqI 2rN68wj0l/OuQ9V4hkxyDXJUVT8eIoDmFDHXPTsN6r405YSsFC26ik2hLrIRlJwxPkwU AdgLDW/zhl4qZtgtM/qaLdbEn2be6yzca/AmhSq7BYOfRJkeAVQZ0QM2PIXyKZho3fPJ 38PjOIC7PF1+nVFTwO1QEWzbaKuvX9WNIz7q8cp5pD1cJJyHaae9X2xNVLobGQ86hcIv 9OfsGvC+OzmJ7/OBW9fMhpMkie3/76CjWAMR3SsKEakqrStFYqq1nKMBPAX1pn6ctlsD 08Hw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j13si4454676otq.146.2020.01.09.13.04.19; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:04:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728767AbgAIUI0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:08:26 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:55777 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725763AbgAIUIZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:08:25 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 009K7ZKP004645; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:07:35 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 009K7XMf004644; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:07:33 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:07:33 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, luto@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin() Message-ID: <20200109200733.GS3191@gate.crashing.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:52:34PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Wondering why we get something so complicated/redundant for > vdso_read_begin() > > static __always_inline u32 vdso_read_begin(const struct vdso_data *vd) > { > u32 seq; > > while ((seq = READ_ONCE(vd->seq)) & 1) > cpu_relax(); > > smp_rmb(); > return seq; > } > > > 6e0: 81 05 00 f0 lwz r8,240(r5) > 6e4: 71 09 00 01 andi. r9,r8,1 > 6e8: 41 82 00 10 beq 6f8 <__c_kernel_clock_gettime+0x158> > 6ec: 81 05 00 f0 lwz r8,240(r5) > 6f0: 71 0a 00 01 andi. r10,r8,1 > 6f4: 40 82 ff f8 bne 6ec <__c_kernel_clock_gettime+0x14c> > 6f8: > > r5 being vd pointer > > Why the first triplet, not only the second triplet ? Something wrong > with using READ_ONCE() for that ? It looks like the compiler did loop peeling. What GCC version is this? Please try current trunk (to become GCC 10), or at least GCC 9? Segher