Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2524752ybl; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:24:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx4UHWFSCT5e+wrmk382ZXlyC6UUVM7sYdfcoOhgAJgynD3xCNIHfa3+ToBTKxp3sae5dXH X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:53:: with SMTP id v19mr5320950oic.18.1578608663130; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:24:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578608663; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yg7P6xA/1lnNfTKfmUU0COT5sMuPh4JLpxrUA+FryJjS2mhwzFoDLnixhjVH/WJSo9 LWW1tFh8pXriPwI30O1qKOiNTJzYkS7hvxSjHMYGGauoeWfOgkCji8dpjm2WIoogCPnb h52R+ioR7F9+g9UmAB0kFCkLCO46D2j96ZMPG8CiNTZMtYQRPeV2Y+X16vp/CbiVjc0t w1uuAilu0g+HJeFOTnp+GQ0ctPeSVFZ0tS6Emrjo4qX6ir0zdcD2UiZ+SKlQccyTCg/n gS6MKi07dRfUVd3JF6Wh5KoneWCzCJIjEHJV0tMlJ8SsXJE3cGZwnzdpnco4P1L5lhYt 7JMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=VaBVEF//pi/f/wi5/1TwSExyuyPaAP5Fc0r57zZuosI=; b=jwByNBUF1uRHW73sSxvo+iocB3H0UL4ww0cjzwCfzobJAlRTsM2YmzN6yIK6KCEpyj W7UhYRYTohvmDKRsA54olNdF0LMGnp+hZk/h0pdVqtoxpF7/D+LZOm/E+rkZCK/8KSc8 18OwWFUOiVIoXOduN0Cp9IzGcDYRoeCO7+wfxbPQqFucq27+/QAC2drzrzayTBOmWq7F Xv373tlqRdewdo/KtdV40X2jJQTfxuel3zLqnnCrjiOi+CA6h6fW2aFUBuKC8dPhBd1u rSIRKlNqeuAI4fTP1CrQMRz8pG5C6dy8GcbWtt2R3JN0iGp434w/aPwIuPZVCa35diPV Sjcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=d3c9vnj7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x185si3945392oig.201.2020.01.09.14.24.12; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=d3c9vnj7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729293AbgAIWWP (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:22:15 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:33051 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725919AbgAIWWP (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:22:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1578608487; bh=Th7DnPvuJhY/6sgGLmR9Zqhdkh3xhTX2Sv71iRDzhvk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=d3c9vnj7KpIMBzwB2eRa519+WeYvI8DLeFksCNp+N6MOMVgFEYXLKTSmMT2908b7b h+ovhr0dvdSTvzMlIPLGCvt6TfaXLQ5BQwkP2rqzVwqgAnlDI1Mz+O+dtDTdp1Ci+v tjrd6yBTxsqJpiO7n6r85eWDSUlBrr10NGMeR/Xg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from localhost ([62.216.209.202]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M6UZl-1inEHH3pcn-006zx4; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 23:21:27 +0100 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 23:21:25 +0100 From: Peter Seiderer To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Annaliese McDermond , Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: tlv320aic32x4: handle regmap_read error gracefully Message-ID: <20200109232125.6ecd6cf7@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20200109203819.GG3702@sirena.org.uk> References: <20191227152056.9903-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20200109203819.GG3702@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:DjtTKNqMyIMnbsmFeAWk2Ki8Sa6uq3PTKJ8OS07PD+CGP4ZkvFP Gr3Ogz07ggS+WCjJtVLhvY3bAARSkUvOWO7BKaaygw2GfFXf6oYMmWkzpOIUgY64y6B4jvZ rGAIVGt7kobbSeBhtxlgRUzAoVyqqni7gQAHqplpqqroUJzbX8G7Ea+jQY5vmdUhz0f3L73 5Nn900wbNP0Pb/ZDHayyA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:7TlgbhqVgX0=:6xHe2w0wZonEysTLqGmvsf rI/9rFFBZzvHhvod0lYvlBsGZa1tGrYc31LOXxo8o36xy2czZWsDdpkuHO5eF00sXXRyCp5vP 5ftBQi+K4UtJRlIe66DANLHq9PclZP6+YT/gXC+5eEL0JeSEmDHng27l1Pujj/yzPklUE6a3q G0CDmw8SHKJ6+sDqEOQgQAy3EqDDgHt5M/G8IeWWaKAZebWyrDy1Vek7jaAszfGOT95VcwST3 x7jKYHEebdfTYE/iAJ0x7JbnxcJmBLVgIosO3TdbAVA8Gr6RGVx5Jln0EFaKJG33S9x9hUOgY AiVxefCWpyAER/r9IGthxzEP1f9AR8kApgq/3D54+01zua587XJDVPPF2NPKTjcMi5opQOAbi 2Ad1+5kxxwR1tWDHf0Zu8SWQ2WHIDjIYx4sGU9XJKVnY5T4VGeXTC2E3UqSQhK7Q0RhA9bHdP rkqjf3cJrE+kcsZ1rTW2Hbc+pTuLagpE5aYhe7oXPYq+1kjwG5jA97AWXl+ZagQhgUth22aRa S/Djy2ySXOzFjZHaxU5hc0bPobZ0iE6nuViuEZdJ4DR5NskaEJ1OpLWQsGR0LwGed1VDjgOO6 3juSoMo5ahTQuO4BG0dFJCXwmjM+4fnJd705f5JdJ5VBwPAyN9PfGC8vvj6l4I5zG5Z7qDyyP FnX4C3CfxsS8KhYO/YUkGMKhkcDMcV+dPgZlQ+Gj61SOqxfm8Jp4VfbC1nC2NjAQpzL9XeTnD 3s654iBA53kvu174mrj+0tqETCs3gnWBHGhrO8RBZ1+YZ+g0gn5N5BZMmrbdG3ypvSjULxrDu CqE5z/LI7XSVtQUXvEeGvKa0ChG22DwTjmf84QLqwlDUjhQLFdRsFTjIF6B2rDRvj2o2ld6pW 7Xqa112L0aqHEsa9bL83nqzs/XsvOLt5HPme5AUkuicFs2Esdm9XkVV8xBRLUHBK8mBHBmySH d978Kq4bfpXsglatC4RcSE11OfnX9sn38Ge7RBI5nvsP8QxTAlWDf9fEanlEVWHrFLpZQ0BEc 5RPxs/3vHjMwoj7a6OdlmNpJ+DB8p7zUp7i9MkcfO6L9ej4Si0k9Y/FXvQgxQ1FB6aKo3G8Ag rXc8C0nmsqgwl881lj65gg6JvpXRbfOgrgzq9WS114w1vDQR/Pd4E5Qm+GXba/1XZFJ5br00d Yc75DRkjTQ8wadKGc9FqollVBddk3ddDFgB8P0CufVFV1U5PSOT2Q4MSito8PsMfZJv+jRhsY 2IQ7Cv5GTuXD+uhAi08FKAxJQ5SnCNoEqG45Eknfq8hKMMbH06cYSm1aRykI= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Mark, On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:38:19 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 04:20:56PM +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote: > > @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ static unsigned long clk_aic32x4_div_recalc_rate(s= truct clk_hw *hw, > > > unsigned int val; > > > - regmap_read(div->regmap, div->reg, &val); > > + if (regmap_read(div->regmap, div->reg, &val)) Unrelated to your question, but I would change this line (on next patch iteration) to (as all other return value checked places for regmap_read in the same file): if (regmap_read(div->regmap, div->reg, &val) < 0) > > + return 0; > > Is this the best fix - shouldn't we be returning an error here? We > don't know what the value programmed into the device actually is so zero > might be wrong, and we still have the risk that the value we read from > the device may be zero if the device is misprogrammed. clk_aic32x4_div_recalc_rate() is used for clk_ops aic32x4_div_ops.recalc_r= ate, did not check/or see on first sight if there is a error handling on the us= age of recalc_rate, but did take a look at some other places where the error handling seems to be to return zero, e.g. sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-ssp-clk.c, etc. The error occurred with linux-5.3.18, with the earlier versions on regmap_= read failure val was (by chance) near 2^31 and evaluated with (val & AIC32X4_DI= V_MASK) to 96 (or similar)...but with 5.3.18 evaluated to 0 and the line return DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, val & AIC32X4_DIV_MASK); produced the 'Division by zero'... Regards, Peter