Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp300469ybl; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 22:13:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzcuNUVrBKM2ZFwRENLC426LiuDjclVxZk33BNvT4Bu4pM7S3AIOGjG3SMp1NA2FE9L21k4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1487:: with SMTP id s7mr1227364otq.269.1578636796593; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 22:13:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578636796; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bK7md+jhVt9z687+VOw2XZoBJ8PO61E1mvT/CnP7E+vwp+/UmOiM16aOgPFLKBOSUs koJDLpumWV/8pEWkKx9qLq5kyb3H0SbDSz17zjMcC5j/L+aB4328Arg3HNCvz8MsA7v2 b2fwKoOv9VWYpURcjz/Zhu3g/TLugZimU8BOUqTq1xQExXHyvI0JXFily55xUw5U//fX fPF7qQbenkKJ14rjZGs++aWwtaeJ//TjA/TQbA8LKWOXa4ZInEHIuRiUEm6bPfnR0L13 JtNFfOz+NMzBzNzG16iXqRM2k2/ZkMOlh4LNWO0LGW3hiliQNlANJ64gVFN254dflMtv pkxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=AlUHMy/B6En2/ScLciT3+ArLL4n5T4qke5YhV+jTru8=; b=vH7kr436f7tx98/u4JiatNW3cd5trS+YVEKvZu+BpZmPIbxvHdjavZa2Qbc8czPrH2 n1A5k3+U+TCMtn2Dv5TkCaGInW7OcOiKNUNUtHxav8QG07T+S9H1zHH476jlBRbG79ko RZ5AaT9t08AUSBEqRC0Z7clBxT2UqzOl/A0+ptxQ+XmUmeXbayaidn281B0/IwJrKZJv KmU9yH7tRNXqI+vqN6LQD3c0E4sRMnSDLY491dYzz7hZKonILmC/irUbr/6D9Vs79A6T OVYSavlhLSdmDwGKjhAxVmLiE6EHuTtB4Y/4cJ4KSHl1j8ssw6Pya7Udjthk1m72xfYc i+cQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s74si489406oie.109.2020.01.09.22.13.05; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 22:13:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731452AbgAJGLM (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:11:12 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39954 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726949AbgAJGLM (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 01:11:12 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25B3328; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 22:11:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.162.42.128] (p8cg001049571a15.blr.arm.com [10.162.42.128]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 736CA3F6C4; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 22:14:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Fix comment for efi_mem_type() wrt absent physical addresses To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ard Biesheuvel References: <1573449229-13918-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <238c9810-dcec-7f4b-7bcb-a339f1f8aaad@arm.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:42:24 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1573449229-13918-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/11/2019 10:43 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > A previous commit f99afd08a45f ("efi: Update efi_mem_type() to return an > error rather than 0") changed the return type from EFI_RESERVED_TYPE to > -EINVAL when the searched physical address is not present in any memory > descriptor. But the comment preceding the function never changed. Lets > change the comment now to reflect the new return type -EINVAL. > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel > Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual Hello Ard, Just wondering if this patch is getting pulled. Dont see it either on linux-next or the following EFI tree. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi (efi-next) - Anshuman > --- > Changes in V2: > > - Changed comment for efi_mem_type() instead of the return type per Ard > > V1: (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1149002/) > > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > index 77ca52d86e30..47b0bf7a2b7f 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ u64 efi_mem_attributes(unsigned long phys_addr) > * > * Search in the EFI memory map for the region covering @phys_addr. > * Returns the EFI memory type if the region was found in the memory > - * map, EFI_RESERVED_TYPE (zero) otherwise. > + * map, -EINVAL otherwise. > */ > int efi_mem_type(unsigned long phys_addr) > { >