Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:54:53 +0100
From: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
To: Libin Varghese <libinv@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I/O Scheduling
Message-ID: <20060128185453.12fcd0e6@mango.fruits.de>
In-Reply-To: <43DB405E.4020602@gmail.com>
References: <43DB405E.4020602@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1126
Lines: 33

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:28:54 +0530
Libin Varghese <libinv@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>         Is there any work done on new I/O scheduling techniques (other
> than as, cfq, noop, deadline)?

Hi,

i'm also interested in these. Especially I/O priorities per process/task
similar to scheduling priorities. It would be just awesome to be able to
give i.e. a hd recording program (or any other data aquisition or
playback program) a high I/O priority.

Image no buffer overruns ever in a hd recorder. Or no more video
dropouts when watching a movie and at the same time copying a file from
the same partition you play the video from.

Is there any work done in this area. I faintly remember to have read
about something like this over a year ago, but have forgotten all the
specifics.

Thanks for all infos and regards,
Florian Schmidt

-- 
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/