Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:20:09 -0800 (PST)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Subject:     Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Typo fixes in image header and documentation.
CC:     Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, merker@debian.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        mchehab+samsung@kernel.org
To:     corbet@lwn.net
In-Reply-To: <20200110101707.06800f3c@lwn.net>
References: <20200110101707.06800f3c@lwn.net> <20191210072947.7018340c@lwn.net>
  <4912c007ab6c19321c8c988ae2328efbfb3e582d.camel@wdc.com> <mhng-3a815562-1222-4737-a77c-6dab9948db79@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
  <mhng-94b9cad5-0d14-480f-b428-8752630064d2@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Message-ID: <mhng-9fc36964-582a-4186-818c-e9f7efe05a38@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:17:07 PST (-0800), corbet@lwn.net wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:42:27 -0800 (PST)
> Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> wrote:
>
>> > I was assuming it was going through the risc-v tree since it touches arch
>> > code :)  I can go ahead and apply it.
>>
>> I don't see this in 5.5-rc5.
>
> It's in docs-next; I've not pushed it through straight to 5.5.  I can do
> that, I suppose, if it seems urgent?

I just wanted to make sure it didn't get lost.  The resolution of the thread
was a bit ambiguous and sometimes that results me losing patches, so I just
want to make sure everything is clear before I drop threads from my inbox
(which is essentially my TODO list).  I was just digging myself out of a big
email hole so I figured anything still sitting around would have landed in
Linus' tree by not, but maybe I wasn't as far behind as I thought I was :)

Thanks!

>
> Thanks,
>
> jon