Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1407724ybl; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:05:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyudoxcpFq7UGdsYFmWciZ0bKemNYY4+vwEJ5/4bdvrvZkXssOGsiQunK2Mv+q2Q/KTOfd0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1353:: with SMTP id r19mr5314784otq.288.1578708312914; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:05:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578708312; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ECAhvBZh1KZWvgmkO/aYL4w/R+o+ANwxADodzOlaZ+89LqNAxkS8hBtnbcZa9tQhwy GdxtTBEXrAIpLjpKZMCwWtsVQGCYHfTlo49Ve55wv9ATb7ujU03rGXMMDxPDP56MamR4 R1cYY02b2ZJZV6b7v1srO8y7Tq25UjXZGAkYqDwEkyocxbflp9biuvrjdkmaaBNix5nS k9EMRoB57XhLaprOk9KIII1L/vX/OZTWzh7htz0GtC1SlsNqwKOga2/JRDvIpUOZl8Dy KTygCAL8bGctOjc02dp6D2JD5na3jH0jNlYCj/iWdgKXgylkxILIBknw7UQedMB1H8J6 10jw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=E0b9oUYMsHK6cvMvyK8I+5mfienrq9wqLravALCOE+Q=; b=PW1Z31wFKNbe/9ciB4aNaWYzqm+842rXWxGY5zt5CuH6rBe+3qTwBCfr3lATISXzEP AQtJQGsnGOlgRvc+3jXJWsV7veOOcZ9GhlwAyBD9IbNO6xtCgO14/5zMt2xzDXyzcW2W gTND6LAd37NI1pd76mvzuifowmLUdQr5mk5w5JdJag86HZnKUsX5JZB9p8MU+lhwLmpU /l/IZNVJ3MUEELfOv45hb9tgeDHbyJZST2TLOjzc4WjsPV4RreUFyWTsXcm3lJGFlD2Z ammD8FC/KwG04qzBWEyuYqE6xhZzr+Ma+RAJi5rW6WE7RRhwEpKhTuCis5ewA38L7ciQ p40Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c7si2976928oto.305.2020.01.10.18.04.58; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728000AbgAKCDz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:03:55 -0500 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:51696 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727877AbgAKCDz (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:03:55 -0500 Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8902B17FB6D3794D71C7; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:03:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.174]) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.213]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:03:46 +0800 From: "Zengtao (B)" To: Sudeep Holla CC: Linuxarm , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes Thread-Topic: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes Thread-Index: AQHVwRzFqRRtqHdXdESmtZr5m5x/BafeywsAgAE0VVCAA0cRAIABfdIQ Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:03:46 +0000 Message-ID: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340D6E59@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <1577935489-25245-1-git-send-email-prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> <20200107144940.GA47473@bogus> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340B8545@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20200110111622.GA39451@bogus> In-Reply-To: <20200110111622.GA39451@bogus> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.74.221.187] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@arm.com] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 7:16 PM > To: Zengtao (B) > Cc: Linuxarm; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Rafael J. Wysocki; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sudeep Holla > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu > nodes > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:57:34AM +0000, Zengtao (B) wrote: > [...] > > > I have the same concern, I have tried to find out some other return > values > > But seems not good enough. > > Maybe it's better to introduce a new function to replace > of_cpu_node_to_id > > Any good suggestion? > > > > No I don't have any. So please drop the extra logic, add a comment on > -ENODEV return value and use it as needed. OK, I will address the review comments and send v2. Thanks Zengtao