Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1746460ybl; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:00:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpiv2AdkNuQjbN9QaDrVSCyVy6iGYjE4JuOGRuSMK5we3kaKqYDwGrhs8rbGvFGXaSoGEp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1248:: with SMTP id s8mr6147283otp.202.1578736834597; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:00:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578736834; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ujhytAZdlCanxB0TruLf9QekJMvTu4VJ0FVQmTZTF+dxLrCMARPyqMuR70JjwtCkrV HU1spbhfarnhjW8OdJJL9/a48K+GtX9eC90Qm5LvIyGvRkxLuvsS2BZUllIJmbkhsRzO Y6cRXXQzvTjZCS/rttxuItvlHlUrI7K58het3ubMKhR9FtaEbTZn0aVR6CScsLRrND8m Ry6lvb6L5mvj6rsQOrYz+n/oPxM5prvNgdifWRL51liywscoAwIP10j+z6YC622VWJD2 7YDa5ROW9xd8HQ5ysutKhL7lOmlJj+JLcYBJyK3nUSMDyeWa4m61VXlrF+Cvydyf2Yh0 3ylw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=MWdhkTFyGuvdRppnu/eQMfypxqFkxthTOQLnF9LBU/E=; b=GRudq14eTl0MbHDGLmAupJzxh/vB34JPGhfHzlJ8SBQ8MQX2mTyQ2Q/58KHZH8UXhm MrQQWkXSoA6IxozmJ8Vcy9xTecFMmhZAxLHTf1VQqPMC/32vzhCZMt1eFVFxwYFgG0w4 tYZlCwef6WsEsFhYYJDJ9r4eIDSDnZHHAd0gXglcHKGt0yeXPlZaVPQOCgagJUUaiwTN g4Ar8Yj8z4MboJDDA7EVDIeg0m6ZQKla52fkJJXEVuXxGyiF2y8TBKiCuL0d7GwFZkkj 0XdkiBTV/AAtx+TQW4RDijziZusGyT302lgea+wktbQGy+OkHc5lu1qbcSDco+KA70Vp SXhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="wQ5o/MLN"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d22si3545402oti.316.2020.01.11.02.00.23; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="wQ5o/MLN"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729174AbgAKJ6d (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:58:33 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51894 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728936AbgAKJ6c (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:58:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [62.119.166.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E08F62077C; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:58:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578736711; bh=lNtSS+g7YuzOW8rkhuOquM3gfaiN1fpKJ89fWOpKUbo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wQ5o/MLN1c08jHf5SM87Ej78/kMpY9UTU2Jqi2A65mmKeOOaYBVonM6i1ywu9sqJ3 AjjRPflohIswBh729vx2WRpOVW1QZRaToCCHOFl2iLzJekZkvQFLQsCCliBuivAjK2 nz/TlODNC0uisU3ws9E16d3IiFwnln+ORaO1V8Co= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Pengcheng Yang , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.4 53/59] tcp: fix "old stuff" D-SACK causing SACK to be treated as D-SACK Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:50:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20200111094851.453138971@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200111094835.417654274@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200111094835.417654274@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pengcheng Yang [ Upstream commit c9655008e7845bcfdaac10a1ed8554ec167aea88 ] When we receive a D-SACK, where the sequence number satisfies: undo_marker <= start_seq < end_seq <= prior_snd_una we consider this is a valid D-SACK and tcp_is_sackblock_valid() returns true, then this D-SACK is discarded as "old stuff", but the variable first_sack_index is not marked as negative in tcp_sacktag_write_queue(). If this D-SACK also carries a SACK that needs to be processed (for example, the previous SACK segment was lost), this SACK will be treated as a D-SACK in the following processing of tcp_sacktag_write_queue(), which will eventually lead to incorrect updates of undo_retrans and reordering. Fixes: fd6dad616d4f ("[TCP]: Earlier SACK block verification & simplify access to them") Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1685,8 +1685,11 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, } /* Ignore very old stuff early */ - if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una)) + if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una)) { + if (i == 0) + first_sack_index = -1; continue; + } used_sacks++; }