Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1753889ybl; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:08:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4F417xCRsEMAi7chKx2dXfviOliXdgaUYPXzTDnFqTC8jtXAFSXKdGCE5WOvINY3Pgezs X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:10c6:: with SMTP id z6mr6531571oto.203.1578737306669; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:08:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578737306; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w8nEtf69xcpk9trSzVvSSfDvoMP5YvH+x+ygcr/4Wzm3WbyyKq91GGG4t6LygxOqK7 rIw5nm12o6Zzc0+didg6heibNynMDocb7dTK3tEr+kl8GwZsL5woxq7JMuN5BLpGS52v 6aCLDTTv4UNHTFaeLtdm+VwS/pppt3fWy+g8P8ZMD3FKz4PdMR2WAoM7JTyUfOu0Szk4 4Uu1Ks/2Hua7SzXNGUbs3owojeVI0Q3drTvi6TtiQFukNUi5uzACEwPb7tpyzuNreluG +J7MUQk+4u9NlycVLnufM7W/vdfjgdG7s4Xx5E028dkyGI3wTPqIHbYs9u7a34agwzhe gpbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=qbiL/NKm3JQvN0c+OKehMOw0VXE5rwQQ1jxGrI+F4jw=; b=yuVSzx3Ry59z1Mm0hCJplrBT5mxFg0CEm4Cj6i+BEc7TZAO6z++WeBdxMOeP+4WcI+ Tb3bKniqQmy+VLI2rkG1yRBpNKb28P3gUsh0AK3opC4o+BupZ5TSOlGxVq3PAHZ0aiZa IzEVGrifFZg6IKGNhcXLJgWp7qRVaQDG8li0euo8dJrKHr9vVwSyvm/Ei4gjXG/1KBIr Qc/mM/G9H6CYC1p8mGXDp11RMoJsZk53Y2tBKygRx6E1rZ3EXd+b4i4dFIakEIZyc8FY c9VTax9vsZ5CF7bn5+3L9VOCjkmNWtzDPo/TtV8ftjVY9a4/ogsOlUUrjOHRkZrTcSs7 9uJA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=DiT47Fhx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x26si2697420oie.73.2020.01.11.02.08.15; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=DiT47Fhx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729654AbgAKKG0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:06:26 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40416 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728978AbgAKKGZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:06:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [62.119.166.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C89F020848; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:06:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578737184; bh=ho01mEuU6dIoDhvyrj06jtKiuTZ+VxeJY4a9GyouQ0Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DiT47FhxAMSr4lKzTKTSYDo2vtFOTu7OA6EF1uzrtPakubSZo/7r/C/niu7vWVHxz 4A29CWmOtSaDO1SrBqTGZGyd7fjAgugi1m9xscRdBLbQaaT0WxXmcpVz9akuJFUHuA rHdY5yAb1CByTyAhnq3KKoE1befcNs3tOv1Y4/4M= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Pengcheng Yang , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.9 85/91] tcp: fix "old stuff" D-SACK causing SACK to be treated as D-SACK Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:50:18 +0100 Message-Id: <20200111094912.821724459@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200111094844.748507863@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200111094844.748507863@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pengcheng Yang [ Upstream commit c9655008e7845bcfdaac10a1ed8554ec167aea88 ] When we receive a D-SACK, where the sequence number satisfies: undo_marker <= start_seq < end_seq <= prior_snd_una we consider this is a valid D-SACK and tcp_is_sackblock_valid() returns true, then this D-SACK is discarded as "old stuff", but the variable first_sack_index is not marked as negative in tcp_sacktag_write_queue(). If this D-SACK also carries a SACK that needs to be processed (for example, the previous SACK segment was lost), this SACK will be treated as a D-SACK in the following processing of tcp_sacktag_write_queue(), which will eventually lead to incorrect updates of undo_retrans and reordering. Fixes: fd6dad616d4f ("[TCP]: Earlier SACK block verification & simplify access to them") Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1741,8 +1741,11 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, } /* Ignore very old stuff early */ - if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una)) + if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una)) { + if (i == 0) + first_sack_index = -1; continue; + } used_sacks++; }