Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:45:31 -0800
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
       jmforbes@linuxtx.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu,
       davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] 2.6.14.7 -stable review
Message-Id: <20060128204531.4786aaea.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601282028210.7205@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20060128021749.GA10362@kroah.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0601282028210.7205@localhost.localdomain>
Organization: YPO4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 969
Lines: 23

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:30:25 -0800 (PST) Chuck Wolber wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.14.7 release. 
> > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to 
> > this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let 
> > us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants 
> > to add a signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> 
> Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but aren't we supposed to stop doing 
> this for the 2.6.14 release now that 2.6.15 is out?

Some people wanted more -stable so the stable team agreed
to do a little more.  Is it a problem?

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/