Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750799AbWA2Eo4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:44:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750821AbWA2Eo4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:44:56 -0500 Received: from c-67-163-99-44.hsd1.tx.comcast.net ([67.163.99.44]:57496 "EHLO leaper.linuxtx.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbWA2Eoz (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:44:55 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:43:07 -0600 From: "Justin M. Forbes" To: Chuck Wolber Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] 2.6.14.7 -stable review Message-ID: <20060129044307.GA23553@linuxtx.org> References: <20060128021749.GA10362@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 720 Lines: 16 On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 08:30:25PM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote: > > Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but aren't we supposed to stop doing > this for the 2.6.14 release now that 2.6.15 is out? > I don't see a problems with doing additional stable releases for any kernel, I just wouldn't commit to supporting any specific number of releases. Basically if people send enough patches to warrant a review/release there is obviously some interest. What is the harm? Justin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/