Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1776400ybl; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:35:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwwLHDxNK2Ztua42dGBThF4U39VJaLx9MzFOLWOSsdRJlCRFTl/Pyilp9y2SK+R8/XirIx3 X-Received: by 2002:a9d:62d9:: with SMTP id z25mr5950293otk.249.1578738958412; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:35:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578738958; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mVnNwgR+LmNN6kcVFYfjd1nFRwRtMIRFX2xBZNqAkFAYXsz6jFmUx9V0UucikDgZ2J POiHwxb2i7e0nW9jip0KK6HtOxJk8EcVefSmN/MrVnXgeWKtaw1vINC+BD7r5zZff/4Z JTLtX4dSpHZ4DbpEq3c/tTkV2yfVjsbgyjJ6Ez0+bKb83g7D2pdHO8n9MqpzXlqvF4ek 0VkUGvygmrgQKe9CpdKvn/rt9aTZvXu5MbrC3w/68MKGBHJrQkfXzrPPb2DFhsQEtXSa yMyWp0V0S5WdgQthGEIrLuN4FBm9Vc2ZAknW3GU63iNQuY/Ax4PbbqoDKdx3P/qWatoG drqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=mnVUM7s3qyB0YynMLWx4pV6XpNa9os6H/Ocgv2Lj6/0=; b=FZnsDnovLkQEoBqnt3cWGiKtD3wCOwI9shvMpfsknrA1CQsom9TaVSoJMPtU7MRxD1 AoYl3tH3/4iM4yG3r3ljvaHEFBa4tJiZoOnrpty2KQXryeWDAee1thwVhN0eHw6ltrJH E7sY7l1ph+9GsuxpDFEDLiOlFGYz/Goo6b1SvFn9t1n5DIGCJmNzXx6gKfuGlbQ3jJeE c/J7sf1rqEPVLVQa4tY2kjLyccD20YDNaPw1toCzFPeGmgXQmRfoGGzYUmso5f2ne/wP MW+1Fjao0rrX0S0rKuwh8qynBC3Iha1sUZwfcTOdTEZScx6X+ygTIPq9MOFy+ifETjvh 0A1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=l0LaPHlh; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d20si3480052oti.311.2020.01.11.02.35.46; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:35:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=l0LaPHlh; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731609AbgAKKdc (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:33:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48102 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731419AbgAKKd2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 05:33:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [62.119.166.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3F0220678; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:33:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578738808; bh=cZX9WaJMkEhAVaOZ8IfgV5CsYjAVxPKnk4yiipXnIhw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=l0LaPHlhiFRvN2lVCu5fhELD5zwLZJ8BLrZbWVRHkyEhnt4QUPQKYUznHz4NFpSaj VrpySofapbELLB0kg97yj6VlktlR7YycO+7viQBSRQeXp9rI2XS0Y/cdS7m0J9ZcSJ xfDaR1nWos5axHL59E5txIn9wBQaoPR9nPuVRv84= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Pengcheng Yang , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 5.4 149/165] tcp: fix "old stuff" D-SACK causing SACK to be treated as D-SACK Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:51:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20200111094940.253076081@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200111094921.347491861@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200111094921.347491861@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pengcheng Yang [ Upstream commit c9655008e7845bcfdaac10a1ed8554ec167aea88 ] When we receive a D-SACK, where the sequence number satisfies: undo_marker <= start_seq < end_seq <= prior_snd_una we consider this is a valid D-SACK and tcp_is_sackblock_valid() returns true, then this D-SACK is discarded as "old stuff", but the variable first_sack_index is not marked as negative in tcp_sacktag_write_queue(). If this D-SACK also carries a SACK that needs to be processed (for example, the previous SACK segment was lost), this SACK will be treated as a D-SACK in the following processing of tcp_sacktag_write_queue(), which will eventually lead to incorrect updates of undo_retrans and reordering. Fixes: fd6dad616d4f ("[TCP]: Earlier SACK block verification & simplify access to them") Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1727,8 +1727,11 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, } /* Ignore very old stuff early */ - if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una)) + if (!after(sp[used_sacks].end_seq, prior_snd_una)) { + if (i == 0) + first_sack_index = -1; continue; + } used_sacks++; }