Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3338467ybl; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:38:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzG6Et9Ow8gZVNZ9QqqZLUJt8/t9oYVpZkOxdahyL1NpJJLgRTFL9Juwcz9NSF1jdMPACO2 X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4796:: with SMTP id b22mr10403809otf.353.1578872315803; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:38:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578872315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QKpUUFpIpJBeWPd+TQiZcc8zW0kvdztWDrpWbJ9jmTa7c39IYsI15LrHc4Rb7z1mO1 /pqoxUrByjDSFijZGGoOQBD4fit1H9+3mPDVtKb2HcjccTIb9TjeydWZ4Gt2vKXG4lSo kFHuBurgApn/8NuQA26un2es+C8bWFhny7jEr2lI28BeudVEp51oSqDrdDEaxeYAMnvm 7+jQqji+52XQuvA7FcrI/jqVb5CkkfM3JZ+LwLLV6id6QN8mVWsrtIkfLs4Tr6+OjzND J8v/RFy3ksUO03OMSpRZytsonIWg9rBz7un8zyPGm/6r/BOjBfv8T+qiLi9Hv4ndQfXh 6G1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Okv2CpJ0HesSyru7f3o58XwWUZz+Q3rdviXD0gbt+Fs=; b=coO15wIB4SXGCS199GuEyDhvqVb1j+m1zD20EGbUXFdTjIF2r2DjE6G8GgD98IB0Cz i//vjrxqm26q9OlwR3UVyBbhkjMsfXzae0P65yHV06BV7lXcnMeMTbxCNKU6uY9Xursn q0bYZOpq5jVaa3K9AqLbhqUur6pUe3ajPf7X98TCbD+ttuEEDL7wvLo6rRPlvBjV2Aim PU+Sxp4lanl6u4PKEMxx6HpiKyuuTGQRxBRyiRgUx6hMOeT4tl7KieaQLDLodPWOkhrC 6+0+BYhD6pmFU4OMZv8wuasVrP+lq3G/wB81XR8gabqb/fJBu8yWcCbuS9N4WTfi2mj6 10Hg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g138si5281487oib.190.2020.01.12.15.37.55; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387475AbgALXb2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 12 Jan 2020 18:31:28 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33012 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727323AbgALXb1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jan 2020 18:31:27 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F10530E; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:31:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20B963F534; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:31:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:31:22 +0000 From: Qais Yousef To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , valentin.schneider@arm.com, qperret@google.com, Patrick Bellasi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Add a new sysctl to control uclamp_util_min Message-ID: <20200112233122.b26kidww6xphuyqq@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20191220164838.31619-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20200108134448.GG2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200109130052.feebuwuuvwvm324w@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200110134236.GM2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200110134236.GM2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/10/20 14:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:00:58PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote: > > On 01/08/20 14:44, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > Did cpu_uclamp_write() forget to check for input<0 ? > > > > Hmm just tried that and it seems so > > > > # echo -1 > cpu.uclamp.min > > # cat cpu.uclamp.min > > 42949671.96 > > > > capacity_from_percent(); we check for > > > > 7301 if (req.percent > UCLAMP_PERCENT_SCALE) { > > 7302 req.ret = -ERANGE; > > 7303 return req; > > 7304 } > > > > But req.percent is s64, maybe it should be u64? > > if ((u64)req.percent > UCLAMP_PERCENT_SCALE) > > should do, I think. Okay I'll send a separate fix for that. Cheers -- Qais Yousef