Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3751805ybl; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 01:56:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzncA4FrLTNyWoux/Yeg0n/NAZn6XCDrSolGwC+9GDZqcc/LGfc5wkivx1PPw2jlaXyGoLs X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7b51:: with SMTP id f17mr12382833oto.302.1578909381181; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 01:56:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578909381; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WqYHuQS+KdB+/J2Pnr2xNAkp7x5yuCxwNkQmHIJRbiQKfxWQ0x40TiG6cj6LoM4FWU Kp3ThNFDTMNN+wHrS9WTuuYAPZ3/0dUmoNnRrJzqILG4EKqJPTb19UK8leouWRFuhQ69 X71AVkkHgd5vokGBoU8WPnzkmkH/yL5vd0aP0JPpUi1NGMUHsZy+hG1oAdGv2C1FQfun S9RPNUeDDb4P6ZqldQipQSVe3Zup/5VrkVpY9S+fymq02NN0aVq66L9IeT7WgHjEgY/Q WwcHaCVr/F3z6Xo99axfFYha+ukzWtiHlhvkDn6aJDjEBaDSyxFG7dP/KTrUvN4sac9Z BoAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :ironport-sdr:dkim-signature; bh=x7xJTqB14LWoSFgsa+eCPpwC/buUotSsSvKgqBM35Yo=; b=r8TTEvLE6GBr6OxEqUhcsCEhdYS0NQBCCmEOo8MNajpmBPuySd2uj5qNQOjuOvRglZ P7l9hOkuwSwPRBWziYlYoTupFRxnDisw6uenE8vr7YgeVGOKtodAkLOfVy4VYOH1AMsX fNTN55QM1W1M0/xMmBI039HI1pMjnK5QC/ZpkxbleCPDr1NqWfGMtX9ag0XPg3CcG5R2 9hGptDYYfBfosCmRHk/qXcMX887aoGpzP6dkTbx44HY3GrHBrlgJLinjuRWEm6ilunEa Fpn4I9vG1kv7JF6sy4+3L7Ks8JUn3+rgdYgUcRpDG6wvUCHXhuuFO0oGMNdqsZZDrHKb Sxmg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@citrix.com header.s=securemail header.b=dKY7z9FV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=citrix.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a14si5593813oid.58.2020.01.13.01.56.09; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 01:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@citrix.com header.s=securemail header.b=dKY7z9FV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=citrix.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726375AbgAMJzS (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 04:55:18 -0500 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com ([216.71.145.155]:33588 "EHLO esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725992AbgAMJzS (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 04:55:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1578909318; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=x7xJTqB14LWoSFgsa+eCPpwC/buUotSsSvKgqBM35Yo=; b=dKY7z9FVWudV/rhTiuEzFU/hRXj83jaUogSIKR6swvPsj6I+4KC6TKKT 4bvZAmhWQ6gppWjIGpSYfQ99TRP/KG3s/qjBou8wB6G58muStnKvtq/oA strYSdpPJaCWId6ilYRuaXBdOEk0XfOv+cXEC0WdFuDmgaObCB0GhAAvG Q=; Authentication-Results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of roger.pau@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of roger.pau@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: JfT05Zxv6Ttu7bOIRF8cT096SWH96bNNGjcAzINGkIUCaMfRd2VuA5qaKWjU42bxNdu9S6FVSU kMxRM8gCs1bbBPg9Og6QUvQ3/TjuamvJwVv645LEHV/R9y6VcRYt4hjWOqr6Qj+WjzWIv5N1kq q4sukZK2YwbRqNq/68uhdVRuGkJMro9uHe4CSGhBbea9oVtGSNybIgs97GurbC5O5ZlRFdoxqj Y0/rNRUS75owEXBcJbc5/qKGsTg7GCUqtNqWdla6dMvu3fXuhIH0oqh9zsAZT4+nUaO7O10lD1 MdU= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 10812478 X-Ironport-Server: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,428,1571716800"; d="scan'208";a="10812478" Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:55:07 +0100 From: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= To: SeongJae Park CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 0/5] xenbus/backend: Add memory pressure handler callback Message-ID: <20200113095507.GE11756@Air-de-Roger> References: <20191218183718.31719-1-sjpark@amazon.com> <20200113094952.30727-1-sjpark@amazon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200113094952.30727-1-sjpark@amazon.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS02.citrite.net (10.69.22.113) To AMSPEX02CL01.citrite.net (10.69.22.125) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:49:52AM +0100, SeongJae Park wrote: > Every patch of this patchset got at least one 'Reviewed-by' or 'Acked-by' from > appropriate maintainers by last Wednesday, and after that, got no comment yet. > May I ask some more comments? I'm not sure why more comments are needed, patches have all the relevant Acks and will be pushed in due time unless someone has objections. Please be patient and wait at least until the next merge window, this patches are not bug fixes so pushing them now would be wrong. Roger.