Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3864895ybl; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 04:04:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx4bCy05S6eTr6Se7TN1zkq3asw1cOAwKWj4i6qKRsGsOPT8nDUdH/BD4w+53Onte468eX8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:128e:: with SMTP id z14mr12358221otp.184.1578917086577; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 04:04:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578917086; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k1Aw1TNWiYFKRQ8Q2BV5fwCvHPW6yEQyDU4+VEzTZU1xeIsux2albpCMRONgfom3y2 WuoH9bDZWucJP0PVvYmDIuZHscLfedycoPtTRYhiA7Mn45MxKqQXKniy/m+w+1iRKGie akaMTWttaHOEFmceMtWOGeAUGIAZGruuqlwkEd1DhWuVY0jtQ95HhKMmyn+vvpu/kUiH aBLGHCOWbAEKrNf9xlZKb1CHrbRD30lQrlCvVQtN0ECsdl1uZ+CedTL/IpGyb6WFVDon S4h56qGQYA0nK64rFIMaKFWykuiJxmF2hWM3i/qGGNt9Tfwoba771GZJI48IiMBo3oRQ XcHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=cD81fPaOKLkHPFiVeQI/YHQ9nv6T7zCDUJAToiRaHO0=; b=Naceipgx58iP8h4WjuR6LJCp6NYQnc3nap0u+/R3N1Tadddhb3cX5ZRUQibepq6JFV dQV5koinCO3wJwV5v6eTxzqqt2Qe3PJ9fNAIN1bkQ8Lv97bZxySvn9rcVkSh/BCoRYx3 7E2L8OcmDMT+AgFEScwmy7rPgCbFnmCxOCv5WW6xrrifInlgKxf2cP4mLYzQji7utTtX bICIUPvehaE8W4NdvLM1R+eUA1FMfH8mdCyAwTpJGZdbhSpywWwEWIJoe0LMZcwwlKKd rOP1oxKco3I++PYMpjbHrU+7d3SvWjEngzXBS4yu4nH+Wz8MREmRV2dhNFTjBT7AMr4d M6Ow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k8si6737727otp.13.2020.01.13.04.04.33; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 04:04:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728813AbgAMMCy (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 07:02:54 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:38470 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726127AbgAMMCx (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 07:02:53 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A9B13D5; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 04:02:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.20]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23CB73F6C4; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 04:02:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:02:50 +0000 From: Andrew Murray To: "Z.q. Hou" Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in" , Leo Li , "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , Mingkai Hu , "M.h. Lian" , Xiaowei Bao Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 10/12] PCI: mobiveil: Add PCIe Gen4 RC driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs Message-ID: <20200113120249.GO42593@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20191120034451.30102-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> <20191120034451.30102-11-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20191120034451.30102-11-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1+81 (426a6c1) (2018-08-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:46:23AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote: > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > This PCIe controller is based on the Mobiveil GPEX IP, which is > compatible with the PCI Express™ Base Specification, Revision 4.0. > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > Reviewed-by: Minghuan Lian > --- > drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig | 10 + > drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile | 1 + > .../mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c | 274 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h | 16 +- > 4 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig > index 64343c07bfed..c823be8dab1c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig > @@ -21,4 +21,14 @@ config PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT > Soft IP. It has up to 8 outbound and inbound windows > for address translation and it is a PCIe Gen4 IP. > > +config PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4 > + bool "Freescale Layerscape PCIe Gen4 controller" > + depends on PCI > + depends on OF && (ARM64 || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) > + depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN > + select PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST > + help > + Say Y here if you want PCIe Gen4 controller support on > + Layerscape SoCs. The PCIe controller can work in RC or > + EP mode according to RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] setting. I think you can remove the last sentence - it doesn't give any value to users of KConfig. > endmenu > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile > index 9fb6d1c6504d..99d879de32d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile > @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL) += pcie-mobiveil.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST) += pcie-mobiveil-host.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT) += pcie-mobiveil-plat.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4) += pcie-layerscape-gen4.o > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..6c0d3e2532db > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c > @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * PCIe Gen4 host controller driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs > + * > + * Copyright 2019 NXP > + * > + * Author: Zhiqiang Hou > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "pcie-mobiveil.h" > + > +/* LUT and PF control registers */ > +#define PCIE_LUT_OFF 0x80000 > +#define PCIE_PF_OFF 0xc0000 > +#define PCIE_PF_INT_STAT 0x18 > +#define PF_INT_STAT_PABRST BIT(31) > + > +#define PCIE_PF_DBG 0x7fc > +#define PF_DBG_LTSSM_MASK 0x3f > +#define PF_DBG_LTSSM_L0 0x2d /* L0 state */ > +#define PF_DBG_WE BIT(31) > +#define PF_DBG_PABR BIT(27) > + > +#define to_ls_pcie_g4(x) platform_get_drvdata((x)->pdev) > + > +struct ls_pcie_g4 { > + struct mobiveil_pcie pci; > + struct delayed_work dwork; > + int irq; > +}; > + > +static inline u32 ls_pcie_g4_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, u32 off) > +{ > + return ioread32(pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_LUT_OFF + off); > +} > + > +static inline void ls_pcie_g4_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, > + u32 off, u32 val) > +{ > + iowrite32(val, pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_LUT_OFF + off); > +} > + > +static inline u32 ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, u32 off) > +{ > + return ioread32(pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_PF_OFF + off); > +} > + > +static inline void ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie, > + u32 off, u32 val) > +{ > + iowrite32(val, pcie->pci.csr_axi_slave_base + PCIE_PF_OFF + off); > +} > + > +static bool ls_pcie_g4_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) > +{ > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; > + u32 header_type; > + > + header_type = mobiveil_csr_readb(mv_pci, PCI_HEADER_TYPE); > + header_type &= 0x7f; > + > + return header_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE; > +} > + > +static int ls_pcie_g4_link_up(struct mobiveil_pcie *pci) > +{ > + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = to_ls_pcie_g4(pci); > + u32 state; > + > + state = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); > + state = state & PF_DBG_LTSSM_MASK; > + > + if (state == PF_DBG_LTSSM_L0) > + return 1; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void ls_pcie_g4_disable_interrupt(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) > +{ > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; > + > + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, 0, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB); > +} > + > +static void ls_pcie_g4_enable_interrupt(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) > +{ > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; > + u32 val; > + > + /* Clear the interrupt status */ > + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, 0xffffffff, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT); > + > + val = PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK | PAB_INTP_MSI | PAB_INTP_RESET | > + PAB_INTP_PCIE_UE | PAB_INTP_IE_PMREDI | PAB_INTP_IE_EC; > + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, val, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB); > +} > + > +static void ls_pcie_g4_reinit_hw(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) > +{ > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; > + struct device *dev = &mv_pci->pdev->dev; > + u32 val, act_stat; > + int to = 100; > + > + /* Poll for pab_csb_reset to set and PAB activity to clear */ > + do { > + usleep_range(10, 15); > + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_INT_STAT); > + act_stat = mobiveil_csr_readl(mv_pci, PAB_ACTIVITY_STAT); > + } while (((val & PF_INT_STAT_PABRST) == 0 || act_stat) && to--); > + if (to < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Poll PABRST&PABACT timeout\n"); > + return; If a timeout happens here - the caller has no idea this has happened and yet the following work doesn't get done. Isn't this a problem? > + } > + > + /* clear PEX_RESET bit in PEX_PF0_DBG register */ > + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); > + val |= PF_DBG_WE; > + ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG, val); > + > + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); > + val |= PF_DBG_PABR; > + ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG, val); > + > + val = ls_pcie_g4_pf_readl(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG); > + val &= ~PF_DBG_WE; > + ls_pcie_g4_pf_writel(pcie, PCIE_PF_DBG, val); > + > + mobiveil_host_init(mv_pci, true); Can mobiveil_host_init fail? > + > + to = 100; > + while (!ls_pcie_g4_link_up(mv_pci) && to--) > + usleep_range(200, 250); > + if (to < 0) > + dev_err(dev, "PCIe link training timeout\n"); > +} > + > +static irqreturn_t ls_pcie_g4_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) > +{ > + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = (struct ls_pcie_g4 *)dev_id; > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; > + u32 val; > + > + val = mobiveil_csr_readl(mv_pci, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT); > + if (!val) > + return IRQ_NONE; > + > + if (val & PAB_INTP_RESET) { Can you explain why this is needed (perhaps also in the cover letter)? > + ls_pcie_g4_disable_interrupt(pcie); > + schedule_delayed_work(&pcie->dwork, msecs_to_jiffies(1)); > + } > + > + mobiveil_csr_writel(mv_pci, val, PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT); > + > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} > + > +static int ls_pcie_g4_interrupt_init(struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci) > +{ > + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = to_ls_pcie_g4(mv_pci); > + struct platform_device *pdev = mv_pci->pdev; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + int ret; > + > + pcie->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "intr"); > + if (pcie->irq < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Can't get 'intr' IRQ, errno = %d\n", pcie->irq); > + return pcie->irq; > + } > + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pcie->irq, ls_pcie_g4_isr, > + IRQF_SHARED, pdev->name, pcie); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Can't register PCIe IRQ, errno = %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void ls_pcie_g4_reset(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct delayed_work *dwork = container_of(work, struct delayed_work, > + work); > + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = container_of(dwork, struct ls_pcie_g4, dwork); > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = &pcie->pci; > + u16 ctrl; > + > + ctrl = mobiveil_csr_readw(mv_pci, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL); > + ctrl &= ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET; > + mobiveil_csr_writew(mv_pci, ctrl, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL); > + ls_pcie_g4_reinit_hw(pcie); > + ls_pcie_g4_enable_interrupt(pcie); > +} > + > +static struct mobiveil_rp_ops ls_pcie_g4_rp_ops = { > + .interrupt_init = ls_pcie_g4_interrupt_init, > +}; > + > +static const struct mobiveil_pab_ops ls_pcie_g4_pab_ops = { > + .link_up = ls_pcie_g4_link_up, > +}; > + > +static int __init ls_pcie_g4_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci; > + struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + int ret; > + > + if (!of_parse_phandle(np, "msi-parent", 0)) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to find msi-parent\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(*pcie)); > + if (!bridge) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge); > + mv_pci = &pcie->pci; > + > + mv_pci->pdev = pdev; > + mv_pci->ops = &ls_pcie_g4_pab_ops; > + mv_pci->rp.ops = &ls_pcie_g4_rp_ops; > + mv_pci->rp.bridge = bridge; > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie); > + > + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&pcie->dwork, ls_pcie_g4_reset); > + > + ret = mobiveil_pcie_host_probe(mv_pci); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Fail to probe\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + if (!ls_pcie_g4_is_bridge(pcie)) Is this a check that could apply to all host bridge drivers and thus live in mobiveil_pcie_host_probe? > + return -ENODEV; > + > + ls_pcie_g4_enable_interrupt(pcie); Is there an issue here in that we enable interrupts *after* telling the kernel about our controller? (Same applies for bailing if the IP isn't a bridge). Thanks, Andrew Murray > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_g4_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-pcie", }, > + { }, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_driver ls_pcie_g4_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "layerscape-pcie-gen4", > + .of_match_table = ls_pcie_g4_of_match, > + .suppress_bind_attrs = true, > + }, > +}; > + > +builtin_platform_driver_probe(ls_pcie_g4_driver, ls_pcie_g4_probe); > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h > index 750a7fd95bc1..c57a68d2bac4 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ > #define PAGE_LO_MASK 0x3ff > #define PAGE_SEL_OFFSET_SHIFT 10 > > +#define PAB_ACTIVITY_STAT 0x81c > + > #define PAB_AXI_PIO_CTRL 0x0840 > #define APIO_EN_MASK 0xf > > @@ -51,8 +53,18 @@ > > #define PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB 0x0b0c > #define PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_STAT 0x0b1c > -#define PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK 0x01e0 > -#define PAB_INTP_MSI_MASK 0x8 > +#define PAB_INTP_RESET BIT(1) > +#define PAB_INTP_MSI BIT(3) > +#define PAB_INTP_INTA BIT(5) > +#define PAB_INTP_INTB BIT(6) > +#define PAB_INTP_INTC BIT(7) > +#define PAB_INTP_INTD BIT(8) > +#define PAB_INTP_PCIE_UE BIT(9) > +#define PAB_INTP_IE_PMREDI BIT(29) > +#define PAB_INTP_IE_EC BIT(30) > +#define PAB_INTP_MSI_MASK PAB_INTP_MSI > +#define PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK (PAB_INTP_INTA | PAB_INTP_INTB |\ > + PAB_INTP_INTC | PAB_INTP_INTD) > > #define PAB_AXI_AMAP_CTRL(win) PAB_REG_ADDR(0x0ba0, win) > #define WIN_ENABLE_SHIFT 0 > -- > 2.17.1 >