Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:04:38 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt: Clarification
Message-ID: <20060129210438.GA8193@suse.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601290032110.7252@localhost.localdomain> <20060129171047.GA10467@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601291149060.7753@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601291149060.7753@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 917
Lines: 25

On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 11:52:05AM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > People complained that we immediatly abandonded the last stable kernel 
> > when a new one came out, so we said we would take patches for a bit on 
> > the last series if people wanted to send them.
> > 
> > That's all, it's not some confusing thing, and we are very much not 
> > going to accept patches for "any" kernel release.
> > 
> > So no, I'm not going to accept this.
> 
> Ok, I gave it a shot. Is it worth pursuing an alternate wording to better 
> document our scope?

Personally, I don't think so, but if you convince enough others...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/