Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S278481AbRJPA0S>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:26:18 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S278480AbRJPA0H>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:26:07 -0400
Received: from waste.org ([209.173.204.2]:29473 "EHLO waste.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S278482AbRJPAZx>;
	Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:25:53 -0400
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:28:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>
To: Riley Williams <rhw@MemAlpha.cx>
cc: Luigi Genoni <kernel@Expansa.sns.it>,
        Henning P Schmiedehausen <hps@intermeta.de>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.0.39 kernel release history
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110142007300.6433-100000@Consulate.UFP.CX>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110151921480.29359-100000@waste.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Riley Williams wrote:

> ...between the 0.99.12a and 0.99.14 kernel releases. I suspect both that
> there were other kernels in each of the three gaps shown above, but have
> been unable to find any reliable information regarding them. Personally,
> I would anticipate full alphabets for both the 0.99.12 and 0.99.13
> subseries as occurs with the 0.99.14 subseries, but can't prove it.

I distinctly remember running a 0.99.13j for quite a while. I believe it
was the stock kernel in an early Slackware.

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/