Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964775AbWA3Qtw (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:49:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932327AbWA3Qtv (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:49:51 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:29587 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964773AbWA3Qtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:49:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200601301621.24051.a1426z@gawab.com> To: Al Boldi Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream... X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 Message-ID: From: Bryan Henderson Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:49:45 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Release 7.0HF124 | January 12, 2006) at 01/30/2006 11:49:42, Serialize complete at 01/30/2006 11:49:42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 826 Lines: 20 >> > With todays generically mass-produced 64bit archs, what's not to care >> > about a cost-effective system that provides direct mapped access into >> > linear address space? >> >> I don't know; I'm sure it's complicated. > >Why would you think that the shortest path between two points is complicated, I can see that my statement could be read a different way from what I meant. I meant I'm sure that the reason people don't care about single level storage is complicated. (Ergo I haven't tried, so far, to argue for or against it but just to point out some history). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/