Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp6297630ybl; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:13:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyiq3ksMPGzxdUvIm5SpWy6dbq74g/VYQQon1JivBJXqv6Y/7mwB+HhidWa0ziycyrw8Li8 X-Received: by 2002:aca:c509:: with SMTP id v9mr19495050oif.151.1579083229603; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:13:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579083229; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uLpPTzYLfvJ0drgYJ6hqB/NP+JeGf0Xab0fodnZKTL6nuMqPqTSQDlGxZLRUG2c2XD dJcuDFgDaISCIrN/44bOtOjSfuqsimyxBi3n3ptZ9+i4zbCJ8Sb4wHJxPJQNba4AbX/K /s9eds4CR5qpptHhi2fZTwDp1o9c50I/mB2r5RQw1V9qrDGgjyQR1d16L+TRFcpsvkZo Uf7harrOXr8Dcf4rODj20ZAO5lSXJbi95EkZNEev/ZpAGbfyNVHdwySxmNXV5tG2RlRS skPPPplg5868RboyMCFI0XniskhdqnsELuN4eQzT67mTJ+XWETufjWMCqbWKal28q1wO 9nLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=mwjTb0JDOm9uVATQfSErph3LU89czh/GehbgDsw9cG4=; b=wT+3mgnKZ4Si4AaHxUUANYgoF8iKQYy6lkW/Lelm/qvAvGHmfhSACpCXMRkdcZavFx IYDA07Z8jO2NxGNKvkcQlyt5hcJ4XIkjABpqQ71IQnLo1lt8mxq99PNZ0dmi7S5a0kkg KVAeUNxW45aqxmxRxqo3auOs98Zf2ZeI+c5XILxHUarj+4eA9fgzxtdAxShR95wE2F6B hWZezIZmEphKXJCac+NB+4N+D66a4gUWige90HyccKSJXWoLS7XwuGeoAlrOPoqsgY8/ zJv1K11GicENz0rCCYU+bFJvOk/xLAX9f9ZjgTMWHzJ5LIQLlnUSQ1rXLl3aw8aQA8ia Q+Mg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u25si10680411otg.170.2020.01.15.02.13.36; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729712AbgAOKMT (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 05:12:19 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:49484 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729539AbgAOKMS (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 05:12:18 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 253B280157DB9357ED58; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:12:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:12:14 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v5] f2fs: support data compression To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , References: <20200102190003.GA7597@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <94786408-219d-c343-70f2-70a2cc68dd38@huawei.com> <20200106181620.GB50058@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <20200110235214.GA25700@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <3776cb0b-4b18-ae0d-16a7-a591bec77a5e@huawei.com> <20200111180200.GA36424@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <72418aa5-7d2a-de26-f0b5-9c839f0c3404@huawei.com> <20200113161120.GA49290@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <326f0049-936c-7dc4-52c3-aa64e13b2cc6@huawei.com> <20200114224837.GB19274@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:12:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200114224837.GB19274@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/1/15 6:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 01/14, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2020/1/14 0:11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 01/13, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2020/1/12 2:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>> On 01/11, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>> On 2020/1/11 7:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>>> On 01/06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>>>> On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2020/1/3 14:50, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>>>>>> This works to me. Could you run fsstress tests on compressed root directory? >>>>>>>>>> It seems still there are some bugs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jaegeuk, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you mean running por_fsstress testcase? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now, at least I didn't hit any problem for normal fsstress case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yup. por_fsstress >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please check https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs/commits/g-dev-test. >>>>>>> I've fixed >>>>>>> - truncation offset >>>>>>> - i_compressed_blocks and its lock coverage >>>>>>> - error handling >>>>>>> - etc >>>>>> >>>>>> I changed as below, and por_fsstress stops panic the system. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you merge all these fixes into original patch? >>>>> >>>>> Yup, let m roll up some early patches first once test results become good. >>>> >>>> I didn't encounter issue any more, how about por_fsstress test result in your >>>> enviornment? If there is, please share the call stack with me. >>> >>> Sure, will do, once I hit an issue. BTW, I'm hitting another unreacheable nat >>> entry issue during por_stress without compression. :( >> >> Did you enable any features during por_fsstress test? >> >> I only hit below warning during por_fsstress test on image w/o compression. >> >> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 33483 at fs/fs-writeback.c:1448 __writeback_single_inode+0x28c/0x340 >> Call Trace: >> writeback_single_inode+0xad/0x120 >> sync_inode_metadata+0x3d/0x60 >> f2fs_sync_inode_meta+0x90/0xe0 [f2fs] >> block_operations+0x17c/0x360 [f2fs] >> f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x101/0xff0 [f2fs] >> f2fs_sync_fs+0xa8/0x130 [f2fs] >> f2fs_do_sync_file+0x19c/0x880 [f2fs] >> do_fsync+0x38/0x60 >> __x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20 >> do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x220 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > > Does gc_mutex patch fix this? No, gc_mutex patch fixes another problem. BTW, it looks like a bug of VFS. Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >From bb17d7d77fe0b8a3e3632a7026550800ab9609e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>> From: Chao Yu >>>>>> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 16:58:20 +0800 >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: compress: fix f2fs_put_rpages_mapping() >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >>>>>> --- >>>>>> fs/f2fs/compress.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c >>>>>> index 502cd0ddc2a7..5c6a31d84ce4 100644 >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c >>>>>> @@ -74,18 +74,10 @@ static void f2fs_put_compressed_page(struct page *page) >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> static void f2fs_drop_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc, >>>>>> - struct address_space *mapping, int len, bool unlock) >>>>>> + int len, bool unlock) >>>>>> { >>>>>> unsigned int i; >>>>>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { >>>>>> - if (mapping) { >>>>>> - pgoff_t start = start_idx_of_cluster(cc); >>>>>> - struct page *page = find_get_page(mapping, start + i); >>>>>> - >>>>>> - put_page(page); >>>>>> - put_page(page); >>>>>> - cc->rpages[i] = NULL; >>>>>> - } >>>>>> if (!cc->rpages[i]) >>>>>> continue; >>>>>> if (unlock) >>>>>> @@ -97,18 +89,25 @@ static void f2fs_drop_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc, >>>>>> >>>>>> static void f2fs_put_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc) >>>>>> { >>>>>> - f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, NULL, cc->cluster_size, false); >>>>>> + f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, cc->cluster_size, false); >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> static void f2fs_unlock_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc, int len) >>>>>> { >>>>>> - f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, NULL, len, true); >>>>>> + f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, len, true); >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> static void f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(struct compress_ctx *cc, >>>>>> - struct address_space *mapping, int len) >>>>>> + struct address_space *mapping, >>>>>> + pgoff_t start, int len) >>>>>> { >>>>>> - f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, mapping, len, false); >>>>>> + int i; >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { >>>>>> + struct page *page = find_get_page(mapping, start + i); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + put_page(page); >>>>>> + put_page(page); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> static void f2fs_put_rpages_wbc(struct compress_ctx *cc, >>>>>> @@ -680,7 +679,8 @@ static int prepare_compress_overwrite(struct compress_ctx *cc, >>>>>> >>>>>> if (!PageUptodate(page)) { >>>>>> f2fs_unlock_rpages(cc, i + 1); >>>>>> - f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, cc->cluster_size); >>>>>> + f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, start_idx, >>>>>> + cc->cluster_size); >>>>>> f2fs_destroy_compress_ctx(cc); >>>>>> goto retry; >>>>>> } >>>>>> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static int prepare_compress_overwrite(struct compress_ctx *cc, >>>>>> unlock_pages: >>>>>> f2fs_unlock_rpages(cc, i); >>>>>> release_pages: >>>>>> - f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, i); >>>>>> + f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, start_idx, i); >>>>>> f2fs_destroy_compress_ctx(cc); >>>>>> return ret; >>>>>> } >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.18.0.rc1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One another fix in f2fs-tools as well. >>>>>>> https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs-tools >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>> . >>>>> >>> . >>> > . >