Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:58:56 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com,
        julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
        christoffer.dall@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        eric.auger@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will@kernel.org,
        andre.przywara@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: get rid of var ret and out jump label in
 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug()
In-Reply-To: <ab61de3a04a74f74866683b062d0bab2@huawei.com>
References: <ab61de3a04a74f74866683b062d0bab2@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <728a5ea123bf6f55b1653e4ccac76175@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-01-14 02:20, linmiaohe wrote:
> Friendly ping :)

Friendly reply:

>> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>> 
>> The var ret and out jump label is not really needed. Clean them up.
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 11 +++--------
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index 
>> 2fff06114a8f..3b836c91609e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
>> @@ -834,14 +834,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_translate(struct 
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,  int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct 
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  					struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
>>  {
>> -	int ret = 0;
>> -
>>  	trace_kvm_set_guest_debug(vcpu, dbg->control);
>> 
>> -	if (dbg->control & ~KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK) {
>> -		ret = -EINVAL;
>> -		goto out;
>> -	}
>> +	if (dbg->control & ~KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> 
>>  	if (dbg->control & KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE) {
>>  		vcpu->guest_debug = dbg->control;
>> @@ -856,8 +852,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct 
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  		vcpu->guest_debug = 0;
>>  	}
>> 
>> -out:
>> -	return ret;
>> +	return 0;

I don't think there is anything wrong with the existing code.
It may not be to your own taste, but is in keeping with a lot
of the KVM code.

If you were making changes to this code, I wouldn't object.
But on its own, this is just churn.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...