Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:15:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:15:09 -0400 Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.57]:60186 "EHLO mclean.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:14:56 -0400 Subject: Re: VM From: Robert Love To: Patrick McFarland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011015230836.B1314@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20011015211216.A1314@localhost> <9qg46l$378$1@penguin.transmeta.com> <20011015230836.B1314@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.12.08.08 (Preview Release) Date: 15 Oct 2001 23:15:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1003202139.1192.3.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2001-10-15 at 23:08, Patrick McFarland wrote: > Im on the type of machine that swapping the least is most favorable. rik's vm > seems that it would be able to swap less, and not swap the wrong things enough > of the time. andrea's, if i try to do something major, it swaps like crazy, > but I havent tested rik's because I dont trust the rest of the ac tree to mess > around with it. Is there any chance of rik's vm being atleast an option to > choose, and possibly see what the community wants? Maybe if rik's vm is > cleaned up, that 5% of stupidity would go down to the less than 1% we all > hope for. There really is nothing to fear in Alan's tree. Give it a tree. In fact, I view Alan as more stable (or at least, less experimental) at this stage in the game. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/