Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200114213809.27166-1-jbx6244@gmail.com> <CAL_Jsq+8X0oRykiQOKVyaxis4H0yO=nzUtnFF_BXdwBkuigr7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <12bbbdbc-027e-90de-fd57-291013167b06@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <12bbbdbc-027e-90de-fd57-291013167b06@gmail.com>
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:03:52 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJD4CY6P+76pM69-4UPpTC+pE5BmyCm+gWhCA-Dd1YB4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: combine common mmc and
 dw-mshc properties
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:02 AM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your explanation.
> I was not aware that was playing.
> So now we go from a 'simple' txt to yaml conversion to a complete
> 'change your node name first' operation.

You only need to update the examples, not all the dts files for now.

> Can you indicate if that common yaml file for dw-mshc and Rockchip
> is still a good idea?

Yes, that's fine.

Rob