Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932317AbWA3WAw (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:00:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932329AbWA3WAw (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:00:52 -0500 Received: from mail.sbb.co.yu ([82.117.194.22]:63341 "EHLO smtp.sbb.co.yu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932317AbWA3WAv (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:00:51 -0500 From: Filip Brcic Organization: ETF Beograd To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Subject: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:00:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: karim@opersys.com, Thomas Horsten , linux-kernel References: <43DE57C4.5010707@opersys.com> <5d6222a80601301143q3b527effq526482837e04ee5a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80601301143q3b527effq526482837e04ee5a@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: G%^x?"S~ij}UIkM5Nz.d:nZd>{CC=paKMd=sx=>M}(IcMH=c22>:@TC/#J)/n}dNxzRo)=?utf-8?q?Z=0A=09XVt+=3FSgp=7DYH9=7D=24aeFY3kX=3Ak?=l[.7:E<=?utf-8?q?=5Exlu+Xh=5F=5D=0A=09a0+VN?=(U/pThxl+{rY_V$U5&9WBQ+l+h$sk-I7{#qO6sf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart28488734.MWW1ICNRua"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601302301.04582.brcha@users.sourceforge.net> X-SBB-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-SBB-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SBB-MailScanner-From: brcha@users.sourceforge.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3643 Lines: 90 --nextPart28488734.MWW1ICNRua Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =D0=94=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0 Monday 30 January 2006 20:43, Glauber de Oliveira = Costa =D1=98=D0=B5 =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BE(=D0=BB=D0=B0): > On 1/30/06, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > > As a software license, GPLv3 can dictate the usage rules for software > > distributed under it, but it can't dictate the usage terms of hardware > > and software independently developed (ex.: DRM'ed hardware and > > proprietary user-space applications). No wording could erase that. > > And what is suggest is not "circumvention", it's just not something > > GPLv3 could cover. > > I may be missing the point here, (In case you're more than welcome to > correct me), but ... Why? Can't a software license restrict the usage > of the software? In which ways do you think the sentence "Don't use in > DRM'ed hardware" differs from sentences like "Not allowed in country > X", "Don't use for commercial purposes", and other alikes ? "Don't use in DRM'ed hardware" and "Don't use for commercial purposes" do=20 differ from "Not allowed in country X". The first two are essentially the=20 same (as far as I am aware, DRM has no use for F/OSS, it is made for=20 commercial stuff). They protect the freedom of the software. The third=20 (!country) is something different since it attacks the freedom of the=20 software. Equivalents (or similar thoughts) would be "Don't use in DRM'ed=20 hardware", "Don't use for commercial purposes" and "Use in any country you= =20 want". > I think > that saying in which hardware your software can or cannot run is a > pretty valid license term (without messing with the question about it > being the right thing to do here). I agree that it is a valid term. I wouldn't like to see my program running = on=20 some obscure DRM'ed hardware when I made it to be free. As far as I can see, Linus wants to allow usage of Linux in DRM'ed hardware= =20 (for ex. future mobile phones). He wants to allow usage, but he hopes that= =20 the customers would make companies disband DRM (and similar=20 crypto/obscure/... stuff). If that is the case, I don't agree with his=20 oppinion that the customers could do anything. Most of the "customers" have= =20 no problem with DRM, and look-a-likes. Most of the customers still use m$ w= in=20 and office, and others think that os x is an free/open operating system. > Besides that, I pretty much agree with the rest of your mail. I do too, but I don't think that "To stop it, just don't buy any of it." is= =20 the solution of the problem. It would be a solution if most of the customer= s=20 would do so. =2D-=20 =46ilip Brcic WWWeb: http://purl.org/NET/brcha/home/ Jabber: brcha@kdetalk.net Jabber: brcha@elitesecurity.org Jabber: fbrcic@gmail.com ICQ# 40994923 Yahoo! brcha MSN: brcha@users.sourceforge.net --nextPart28488734.MWW1ICNRua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iJoDBQBD3oygiWDX+jAieS9nAmSGAgkBi5sWVH6LN3DWIHgOGoLjWd45SEPaoG2L d14ZufqMMsq9vBDZExLIMVdH590LYZuTLXzO+Q/21kBrH8Azxt5GD1UCCKB5JhKP ZvopO5qC7HMaxkIHiMUd443kTlvP0jw/hv0TmS7xTxuSp02ZVmdh2mHzL+4tkZ7e ZbHwDw05Eq1if3bN =lXH0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart28488734.MWW1ICNRua-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/