Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030257AbWAaBcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:32:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030258AbWAaBcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:32:08 -0500 Received: from fmr22.intel.com ([143.183.121.14]:49366 "EHLO scsfmr002.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030257AbWAaBcH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:32:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:31:54 -0800 From: "Siddha, Suresh B" To: Pavel Machek Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" , mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rohit.seth@intel.com, asit.k.mallick@intel.com Subject: Re: [Patch] sched: new sched domain for representing multi-core Message-ID: <20060130173154.B4851@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20060126015132.A8521@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20060129165645.GF1764@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060129165645.GF1764@elf.ucw.cz>; from pavel@suse.cz on Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 05:56:47PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 539 Lines: 14 On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 05:56:47PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Could we all do it with single CONFIG_SCHED_SMT or CONFIG_NUMA or > something like that? No need for zillion options... We thought about it too before and felt that CONFIG_SCHED_MC is more appropriate and cleaner. thanks, suresh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/