Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932214AbWAaCBM (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:01:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932379AbWAaCBL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:01:11 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:20147 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932214AbWAaCBK (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:01:10 -0500 From: Neil Brown To: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:01:03 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17374.50399.1898.458649@cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: klibc list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Exporting which partitions to md-configure In-Reply-To: message from H. Peter Anvin on Monday January 30 References: <43DEB4B8.5040607@zytor.com> <17374.47368.715991.422607@cse.unsw.edu.au> <43DEC095.2090507@zytor.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-face: v[Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D Neil Brown wrote: > > On Monday January 30, hpa@zytor.com wrote: > > > >>Any feeling how best to do that? My current thinking is to export a > >>"flags" entry in addition to the current ones, presumably based on > >>"struct parsed_partitions->parts[].flags" (fs/partitions/check.h), which > >>seems to be what causes md_autodetect_dev() to be called. > > > > I think I would prefer a 'type' attribute in each partition that > > records the 'type' from the partition table. This might be more > > generally useful than just for md. > > Then your userspace code would have to look for '253' and use just > > those partitions. > > > > What about non-DOS partitions? Well, grepping through fs/partitions/*.c, the 'flags' thing is set by efi.c, msdos.c sgi.c sun.c Of these, efi compares something against PARTITION_LINUX_RAID_GUID, and msdos.c, sgi.c and sun. compare something against LINUX_RAID_PARTITION. The former would look like e6d6d379-f507-44c2-a23c-238f2a3df928 in sysfs (I think); The latter would look like fd (I suspect). These are both easily recognisable with no real room for confusion. And if other partition styles wanted to add support for raid auto detect, tell them "no". It is perfectly possible and even preferable to live without autodetect. We should support legacy usage (those above) but should discourage any new usage. NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/