Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp7933717ybl; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:00:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy183x2YaaTIeY2FZoBKYJCyETJEV5CrvGPlKmtx0bjv85tYreY2lWpSh6SSt0LEOU1cNup X-Received: by 2002:a9d:634e:: with SMTP id y14mr2582757otk.162.1579190428376; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:00:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579190428; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=X+AIl82pzWCRQeSuFXRfku6eSaL0x5f3XnQcwPtqsXwTMPX6Y63mc6GjUaieicqhEu gcnxldQMaqV0IR7/gryDi6AEQY8jGPBaMRw4m/MU3nczjIgbsG2E5S2SFCMSDGZZswJo kb7Q5ObQZW42yB0iHSJmCvHWmCMDh1EJRc57543bdJBqt7/zNZ9/zARAk8GAwmbAjwop egYxl5PftX3SqH1GxWYkaT3Rm/2ALd3n8iU+AYRXf5OuQhfKG12Hm3cetPfUZIxhteEu I2fOlbh619ftU51Eh85ufZBmtkrX1s3X9eol0EG/HPfDBbB7zMs4IfB6aYDFmwDU9xhE lH/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=YRSGU6uXmIQ/w1jobHKHvcEG3C4CD3uB+8DI6by3DQI=; b=Se0bxQbvAxVYDWciU8fz7mSPXOPI0wOMTPQkDfBo/yGKBAGFKWLb08j28pdr2Vq/Qd srAiUmk8ciz9joaEPuwumK1UKj3JDDlBRP2FzUUaIGIANJboeB8lyZX4KJppCrKyohg/ kkfdSx3Urap2yU9MsxGS4cTBE9NsveLOXiv0GC2iIUgEVhpfQurxQuRkJQAgA84fVIWZ jZmsJIkdbhy2qTAMVcHLX7YgZ0U7vq1O3PKYiBoe/o2ZupV1KfmOPjSrpozCQwgQakEn iYO4dDHu2YrxJXtAa3VPqWFnuvnMgaQytmzDivF/C2XID9UjVEI/qMDsXVANVx/lqsGa v3+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n18si13952005otf.285.2020.01.16.08.00.15; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:00:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726864AbgAPP7N (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:59:13 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:61560 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726559AbgAPP7L (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:59:11 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2020 07:59:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,326,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="248853709" Received: from labuser-ice-lake-client-platform.jf.intel.com ([10.54.55.45]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2020 07:59:09 -0800 From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com To: peterz@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, acme@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com, pavel.gerasimov@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang Subject: [RESEND PATCH V5 1/2] perf/core: Add new branch sample type for HW index of raw branch records Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:57:56 -0800 Message-Id: <20200116155757.19624-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200116155757.19624-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> References: <20200116155757.19624-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kan Liang The low level index of raw branch records is very useful for reconstructing the call stack. For example, in Intel LBR call stack mode, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack limits to the number of LBR registers. With the HW index information, perf tool may stitch the stacks of two samples. The reconstructed LBR call stack can break the HW limitation. Add a new branch sample type to retrieve the low level index of raw branch records. Only need to save the index for the most recent branch aka entries[0]. Others can be calculated by the max number of HW supported branch records later in perf tool. If we don't know the order of raw branch records, the hw_idx should be -1ULL. This patch sets -1ULL for all architectures for now. It can be changed later if needed. Only when the new branch sample type is set, the HW index information is dumped into the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK output. Perf tool should check the attr.branch_sample_type, and apply the corresponding format for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK samples. Otherwise, some user case may be broken. For example, users may parse a perf.data, which include the new branch sample type, with an old version perf tool (without the check). Users probably get incorrect information without any warning. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang --- arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 + arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 3 +++ include/linux/perf_event.h | 12 ++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 10 +++++++++- kernel/events/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c index 48604625ab31..fe7de222229a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_read(struct perf_event *event, struct cpu_hw_events * } } cpuhw->bhrb_stack.nr = u_index; + cpuhw->bhrb_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL; return; } diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c index 534c76606049..7639e2097101 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c @@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc) cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved = 0; } cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i; + cpuc->lbr_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL; } /* @@ -680,6 +681,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc) out++; } cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = out; + cpuc->lbr_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL; } void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void) @@ -1120,6 +1122,7 @@ void intel_pmu_store_pebs_lbrs(struct pebs_lbr *lbr) int i; cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr; + cpuc->lbr_stack.hw_idx = -1ULL; for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) { u64 info = lbr->lbr[i].info; struct perf_branch_entry *e = &cpuc->lbr_entries[i]; diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index 011dcbdbccc2..554621d99864 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -93,14 +93,26 @@ struct perf_raw_record { /* * branch stack layout: * nr: number of taken branches stored in entries[] + * hw_idx: The low level index of raw branch records + * for the most recent branch. + * -1ULL means invalid. * * Note that nr can vary from sample to sample * branches (to, from) are stored from most recent * to least recent, i.e., entries[0] contains the most * recent branch. + * The entries[] is an abstraction of raw branch records, + * which may not be stored in age order in HW, e.g. Intel LBR. + * The hw_idx is to expose the low level index of raw + * branch record for the most recent branch aka entries[0]. + * For the architectures whose raw branch records are + * already stored in age order, the hw_idx should be 0. + * If we don't know the order of raw branch records, + * the hw_idx should be -1ULL. */ struct perf_branch_stack { __u64 nr; + __u64 hw_idx; struct perf_branch_entry entries[0]; }; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h index bb7b271397a6..14110837b130 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h @@ -180,6 +180,8 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type_shift { PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT = 16, /* save branch type */ + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX_SHIFT = 17, /* save low level index of raw branch records */ + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT /* non-ABI */ }; @@ -207,6 +209,8 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type { PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT, + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX_SHIFT, + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT, }; @@ -849,7 +853,11 @@ enum perf_event_type { * char data[size];}&& PERF_SAMPLE_RAW * * { u64 nr; - * { u64 from, to, flags } lbr[nr];} && PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK + * { u64 from, to, flags } lbr[nr]; + * + * # only available if PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is set + * u64 hw_idx; + * } && PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK * * { u64 abi; # enum perf_sample_regs_abi * u64 regs[weight(mask)]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index cfd89b4a02d8..4be3ba12333f 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -6391,6 +6391,11 @@ static void perf_output_read(struct perf_output_handle *handle, perf_output_read_one(handle, event, enabled, running); } +static inline bool perf_sample_save_hw_index(struct perf_event *event) +{ + return event->attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX; +} + void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle, struct perf_event_header *header, struct perf_sample_data *data, @@ -6480,6 +6485,8 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle, perf_output_put(handle, data->br_stack->nr); perf_output_copy(handle, data->br_stack->entries, size); + if (perf_sample_save_hw_index(event)) + perf_output_put(handle, data->br_stack->hw_idx); } else { /* * we always store at least the value of nr @@ -6667,7 +6674,11 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header, if (data->br_stack) { size += data->br_stack->nr * sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry); + + if (perf_sample_save_hw_index(event)) + size += sizeof(u64); } + header->size += size; } -- 2.17.1