Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200110063755.19804-1-zhang.lyra@gmail.com> <20200110063755.19804-3-zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
 <CAOesGMjNkVpTOhSrLUKjNZnKFk55DTgg29QzVBEFVh3Z=Ra+cQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAfSe-tx+S_tc1y0c5wobQy2xygNr01b3LOqQ4FQtHoDNhHNeA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAfSe-tx+S_tc1y0c5wobQy2xygNr01b3LOqQ4FQtHoDNhHNeA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:56:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOesGMhNxkyAYMeHSRAuxzR51-5eHZ278LLVYe-3jaS7EKa-jw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: Add Unisoc's SC9863A SoC support
To:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc:     SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:44 PM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 01:41, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:38 PM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
> > >
> > > Add basic DT to support Unisoc's SC9863A, with this patch,
> > > the board sp9863a-1h10 can run into console.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
> >
> > You reposting a patch that we have already applied, and there's also
> > no changelog for it in the description.
>
> Oh, I have to explain a bit.
>
> I was expecting an email which inform me that the patch was got merged.
> That's the reason I resent this patchset.

Ah, yes -- me too. This was a combination of two things:

1) The patch was originally sent to arm@kernel.org, not soc@kernel.org
2) I bounced it to there to apply it using PatchWork

... but, it seems that the bot won't reply to patches that have been
bounced, only those who were originally sent there.

In this case, I should have made a manual reply -- I've gotten too
used to the bot and relied on it doing it.

> About the changelog, this new patchset actually had a cover-letter[1]
> in which I documented a little changes (which was not important now).

Not sure why, but I seem to have missed it. Maybe because it was 3
patches on v5, and I didn't notice that one was now a cover letter.
Anyway, all good.

I'll also apply 1/2 shortly.


-Olof