Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200110063755.19804-1-zhang.lyra@gmail.com> <20200110063755.19804-3-zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
 <CAOesGMjNkVpTOhSrLUKjNZnKFk55DTgg29QzVBEFVh3Z=Ra+cQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAfSe-tx+S_tc1y0c5wobQy2xygNr01b3LOqQ4FQtHoDNhHNeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOesGMhNxkyAYMeHSRAuxzR51-5eHZ278LLVYe-3jaS7EKa-jw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOesGMi=1uKK=rCyD+d5yTE3O+HpNXTntNghLaWXt86z+GaKhg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMi=1uKK=rCyD+d5yTE3O+HpNXTntNghLaWXt86z+GaKhg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:22:27 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAfSe-tDDdCix3=C0-BARqeBCMDqM7XUCc_S5kZTEswtK5-ZvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: Add Unisoc's SC9863A SoC support
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc:     SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 08:57, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:56 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:44 PM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 01:41, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:38 PM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add basic DT to support Unisoc's SC9863A, with this patch,
> > > > > the board sp9863a-1h10 can run into console.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
> > > >
> > > > You reposting a patch that we have already applied, and there's also
> > > > no changelog for it in the description.
> > >
> > > Oh, I have to explain a bit.
> > >
> > > I was expecting an email which inform me that the patch was got merged.
> > > That's the reason I resent this patchset.
> >
> > Ah, yes -- me too. This was a combination of two things:
> >
> > 1) The patch was originally sent to arm@kernel.org, not soc@kernel.org
> > 2) I bounced it to there to apply it using PatchWork
> >
> > ... but, it seems that the bot won't reply to patches that have been
> > bounced, only those who were originally sent there.
> >
> > In this case, I should have made a manual reply -- I've gotten too
> > used to the bot and relied on it doing it.
> >
> > > About the changelog, this new patchset actually had a cover-letter[1]
> > > in which I documented a little changes (which was not important now).
> >
> > Not sure why, but I seem to have missed it. Maybe because it was 3
> > patches on v5, and I didn't notice that one was now a cover letter.
> > Anyway, all good.
> >
> > I'll also apply 1/2 shortly.
>
> I'm ahead of myself, it's already applied as well.
>

Thank you very much!
Chunyan


FYI:
The patchset v5 seems also NOT sent to arm@kernel.org, it was
accurately sent to soc@kernel.org :-)
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1214863/