Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a28NRp+SGr44=DTYqL0+ZqtamHwn+WYNTxVRJOJ3HtLSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CGME20200115082824epcas1p4eb45d088c2f88149acb94563c4a9b276@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
 <20200115082447.19520-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20200115082447.19520-10-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
 <CAK8P3a3Vqz=T_=sFwBBPa2_Hi_dA=BwWod=L9JkLxUgi=aKNWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKYAXd9_qmanQCcrdpScFWvPXuZvk4jhv7Gc=t_vRL9zqWNSjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200115133838.q33p5riihsinp6c4@pali> <CAK8P3a1ozgLYpDtveU0CtLj5fEFG8i=_QrnEAtoVFt-yC=Dc0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200115142428.ugsp3binf2vuiarq@pali> <CAK8P3a0_sotmv40qHkhE5M=PwEYLuJfX+uRFZvh9iGzhv6R6vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200115153943.qw35ya37ws6ftlnt@pali> <CAK8P3a1iYPA9MrXORiWmy1vQGoazwHs7OfPdoHLZLJDWqu9jqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <002801d5cce2$228d79f0$67a86dd0$@samsung.com> <CAK8P3a28NRp+SGr44=DTYqL0+ZqtamHwn+WYNTxVRJOJ3HtLSg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:13:23 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-eYLvduvnJhkF6my_XVpZSudnss0Qp35+-CUx_F_TUCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/14] exfat: add misc operations
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        gregkh <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
        Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, sj1557.seo@samsung.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

2020-01-17 18:13 GMT+08:00, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:59 AM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > This is what I think the timezone mount option should be used
>> > for: if we don't know what the timezone was for the on-disk timestamp,
>> > use
>> > the one provided by the user. However, if none was specified, it should
>> > be
>> > either sys_tz or UTC (i.e. no conversion). I would prefer the use of
>> > UTC
>> > here given the problems with sys_tz, but sys_tz would be more
>> > consistent
>> > with how fs/fat works.
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> Could you please review this change ?
>
> Looks all good to me now.
Thanks for your review!