Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932365AbWBAAuF (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:50:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932322AbWBAAuF (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:50:05 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:49365 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932365AbWBAAuE (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:50:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:50:28 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Andrew Morton Cc: a1426z@gawab.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4 Message-Id: <20060131165028.051a05e5.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20060131140107.551e6a3e.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060129144533.128af741.akpm@osdl.org> <200601301620.49199.a1426z@gawab.com> <20060130130007.4925e3ed.akpm@osdl.org> <200601311856.13221.a1426z@gawab.com> <20060131140107.551e6a3e.akpm@osdl.org> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3588 Lines: 99 On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:01:07 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > Al Boldi wrote: > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Al Boldi wrote: > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > - Various other random bits and pieces. Things have been pretty quiet > > > > > lately - most activity seems to be concentrated about putting bugs > > > > > into the various subsystem trees. > > > > > > > > Does it fix the DRM_i810 hang during a suspend-to-ram/disk cycle? > > > > > > I don't know - I don't watch every patch which goes into 49 different > > > trees. Did you try it? > > > > It still hangs w/ drm. > > > > w/o drm STD works like a charm. > > OK. > > > w/o drm STR works lest this t/o and a noisy display in X. > > What do "lest" and "t/o" mean? Please use less abbreviations. "lest" seems to be a real word... maybe a bit dated. t/o is 'timeout'. > > Stopping tasks: ========================| > > Suspending device 0.1 > > Suspending device 0.0 > > Suspending device ide0 > > Suspending device floppy.0 > > Suspending device serio1 > > Suspending device serio0 > > Suspending device i8042 > > Suspending device 0000:01:0a.0 > > Suspending device 0000:01:05.0 > > Suspending device 0000:00:1f.2 > > Suspending device 0000:00:1f.1 > > Suspending device 0000:00:1f.0 > > Suspending device 0000:00:1e.0 > > Suspending device 0000:00:01.0 > > Suspending device 0000:00:00.0 > > Suspending device pci0000:00 > > Suspending device platform > > Intel machine check architecture supported. > > Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. > > Back to C! > > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:01.0[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> > > IRQ 11 > > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1e.0 to 64 > > eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1 > > hda: drive not ready on wakeup > > hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } > > ide: failed opcode was: unknown > > hda: DMA disabled > > hdb: DMA disabled > > hda: drive not ready for command > > ide0: reset: success > > BUG: warning at drivers/ide/ide-iops.c:1235/ide_wait_not_busy() > > ide_wait_not_busy+0xa2/0xb0 > > start_request+0x1a7/0x230 > > ide_do_request+0x23a/0x3c0 > > set_multmode_intr+0x1a/0x70 > > ide_intr+0xeb/0x130 set_multmode_intr+0x0/0x70 > > handle_IRQ_event+0x30/0x70 __do_IRQ+0x55/0xc0 > > do_IRQ+0x42/0x70 > > ======================= > > common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 > > acpi_processor_idle+0x2b6/0x332 > > default_idle+0x0/0x70 cpu_idle+0x58/0x70 > > start_kernel+0x14d/0x170 > > unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1e0 > > hdb: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x40 { DriveReady } > > ide: failed opcode was: unknown > > Restarting tasks... done > > The above is an IDE problem. Are you saying that the above only occurs > when DRM is enabled? > > Please take more time and use more words when describing this problem, thanks. > > > Also, a 100HZ recompile in mainline causes a 400% delay doing a simple lilo, > > which seems fixed in mm. Is there a reason you can't move that to mainline? > > Again, I don't understand what that means. Are you saying that a kernel > compiled with HZ=100 takes 4 times as long to run lilo? --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/