Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Daniel =?utf-8?Q?D=C3=ADaz?= <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
        shuah@kernel.org
Cc:     Daniel =?utf-8?Q?D=C3=ADaz?= <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "open list\:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/x86: Build with LDFLAGS and LDLIBS
In-Reply-To: <20200117165330.17015-1-daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
References: <20200117165330.17015-1-daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:12:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87muam0zxj.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> writes:

> During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and
> LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading
> to defaults which were not necessarily correct.
>
> OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem:
>   ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS?
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>