Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964911AbWBAEbY (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:31:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964912AbWBAEbY (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:31:24 -0500 Received: from liaag1ac.mx.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.29]:26777 "EHLO liaag1ac.mx.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964911AbWBAEbY (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:31:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:28:27 -0500 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4 To: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200601312331_MC3-1-B748-FBF0@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 693 Lines: 26 In-Reply-To: <200601312146_MC3-1-B74E-D5C4@compuserve.com> [I forgot to copy linux-kernel] On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Does this mean that the SMP lock-switching could write all over discarded > __init code? > Oops, never mind... it uses _text and _etext to bound the address range it will touch. That's the problem with these scripts: they produce false positives and even worse, they miss real problems. -- Chuck -- Chuck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/