Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 05:31:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 05:31:21 -0400 Received: from Expansa.sns.it ([192.167.206.189]:62738 "EHLO Expansa.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 05:31:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:31:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Luigi Genoni To: Oliver Xymoron cc: Riley Williams , Henning P Schmiedehausen , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.0.39 kernel release history In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Riley Williams wrote: > > > ...between the 0.99.12a and 0.99.14 kernel releases. I suspect both that > > there were other kernels in each of the three gaps shown above, but have > > been unable to find any reliable information regarding them. Personally, > > I would anticipate full alphabets for both the 0.99.12 and 0.99.13 > > subseries as occurs with the 0.99.14 subseries, but can't prove it. > > I distinctly remember running a 0.99.13j for quite a while. I believe it > was the stock kernel in an early Slackware. > At those times i was still using, I think, SLS. (I was 19, please, I do not have so good memory). But yes, there was a lot of 0.99.13X kernels. I do remember also there was a lot of anxiwety about 1.0.0, maybe even more anxiety in front of what happened for 2.4.0. Luigi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/