Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:54:27 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] gpiolib: have a single place of calling
 set_config()
Message-ID: <20200120095427.GE32742@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20191224120709.18247-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <20191224120709.18247-3-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <CAMuHMdWigj9_CDdDD49qU-y7r+he53v1NEKE9_0RBQCFUrY-Qw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWigj9_CDdDD49qU-y7r+he53v1NEKE9_0RBQCFUrY-Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 09:44:43AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 1:08 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> >
> > Instead of calling the gpiochip's set_config() callback directly and
> > checking its existence every time - just add a new routine that performs
> > this check internally. Call it in gpio_set_config() and
> > gpiod_set_transitory(). Also call it in gpiod_set_debounce() and drop
> > the check for chip->set() as it's irrelevant to this config option.

...

> >         config = PIN_CONF_PACKED(mode, arg);
> > -       return gc->set_config ? gc->set_config(gc, offset, config) : -ENOTSUPP;
> > +       return gpio_do_set_config(gc, offset, mode);
> 
> These two lines are not equivalent: the new code no longer uses the
> packed value of mode and arg!

Good catch!
It's a regression (pin control drivers expects arg to be 1 in case it has been
called thru GPIO framework to set "default" values in terms of certain driver)
and below mentioned commits must be reverted. This one seems has a typo which
must be fixed.

> Hence this leads to subsequent cleanups in commits e5e42ad224a040f9
> ("gpiolib: remove set but not used variable 'config'") and d18fddff061d2796
> ("gpiolib: Remove duplicated function gpio_do_set_config()").

> However, what was the purpose of the PIN_CONF_PACKED() translation?
> Why is it no longer needed?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko