Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:19:27 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] firmware: dmi_scan: Pass dmi_entry_point to
 kexec'ed kernel
Message-ID: <20200120121927.GJ32742@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20161202195416.58953-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20161202195416.58953-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20161215122856.7d24b7a8@endymion>
 <20161216023213.GA4505@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <1481890738.9552.70.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <20161216143330.69e9c8ee@endymion>
 <20161217105721.GB6922@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161217105721.GB6922@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 06:57:21PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Ccing efi people.
> 
> On 12/16/16 at 02:33pm, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:18:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 10:32 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > On 12/15/16 at 12:28pm, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > > I am no kexec expert but this confuses me. Shouldn't the second
> > > > > kernel have access to the EFI systab as the first kernel does? It
> > > > > includes many more pointers than just ACPI and DMI tables, and it
> > > > > would seem inconvenient to have to pass all these addresses
> > > > > individually explicitly.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, in modern linux kernel, kexec has the support for EFI, I think it
> > > > should work naturally at least in x86_64.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for this good news!
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately Intel Galileo is 32-bit platform.
> > 
> > If it was done for X86_64 then maybe it can be generalized to X86?
> 
> For X86_64, we have a new way for efi runtime memmory mapping, in i386
> code it still use old ioremap way. It is impossible to use same way as
> the X86_64 since the virtual address space is limited.
> 
> But maybe for 32bit, kexec kernel can run in physical mode, but I'm not
> sure, I would suggest Andy to do a test first with efi=noruntime for
> kexec 2nd kernel.

Guys, it was quite a long no hear from you. As I told you the proposed work
around didn't help. Today I found that Microsoft Surface 3 also affected
by this.

Can we apply these patches for now until you will find better solution?

P.S. I may resend them rebased on recent vanilla.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko