Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2676937ybl; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:21:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6nw7sUeOWEMiYGJzROxNwS58ylje30qwhl1aFvp1D8YPdj7F2xPhAkmTqZNvxH+r8qgia X-Received: by 2002:aca:ab0e:: with SMTP id u14mr13501291oie.1.1579533715658; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:21:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579533715; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y31N0ArQAFYhVpZTkw7wP0rRKPpgaRHRDJdCG/D5821pwrXqasUwsYRJAGRRHKrpXx bXiu6gPQz6fvME+DVd0/l5O2lqnicLg5kx3LWOJGlM7hujzVeBxuWiIOS6/1bprbeH93 EOZpaK10rSzAQtPxDOHQ8aAPYZV9UeWejberxHowaFwfCzHZVFP4EfpHhqE0b5Jchz3D SE/R2Vgm9KB45qkPLSdHfjNH96u7SuSOmzNsq2rJpBGpquk2YRGZsKBx+DgY/OBrHL4u hBHk/v5S93qeqb7xj2RTnQ0jsfV7wfwzbOMjsbe9b4IfVvWjsYsvmhhcTfOvkCNl96CW kFmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=iz+4gFDrK43rr/hF/K37U6pxTpdQjN2e5RGX/6S+8YM=; b=akPvwr1oAGIrnpOnqzCASqdEmE0xmZxQj4Ten8cgHWhKiky1MVPWmALo2bmBn7L49J x+2dCfygU2uTznpkQJmmspJqxstFJ6jxvMGnhsvnOdjQ7HDq7PEDh/U51RxmAWg5Jo1D ya7LYP9MvFfPY1KtDHQjkxzlqoiMPu0AiYZULNTUE3klgl6PvK02wHcDV/2GsBmChe15 gqkhiQ/2cgUlRgli3YoyetnxlQCZ3UZA2ps/2T8LzUdWKMEicvpsaYel2UIf4p4ZggNm nInP/jBRF+SrXsZnkZrSKtir/HNbxRMxmAxq1xe/Uu+sklKBrBHWz6mEoVZMXtwXJRRs DDdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m9si17462077oie.148.2020.01.20.07.21.43; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:21:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728988AbgATPUl (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:20:41 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:52061 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726626AbgATPUk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:20:40 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 00KFJb5J002311; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:19:38 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 00KFJbq8002310; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:19:37 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:19:36 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , nathanl@linux.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, luto@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/11] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation. Message-ID: <20200120151936.GB3191@gate.crashing.org> References: <20200117085851.GS3191@gate.crashing.org> <3027b6d2-47a9-a871-7c52-050a5f9c6ab7@c-s.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3027b6d2-47a9-a871-7c52-050a5f9c6ab7@c-s.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 02:56:00PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >Nice! Much better. > > > >It should be tested on more representative hardware, too, but this looks > >promising alright :-) > > mpc832x (e300c2 core) at 333 MHz: > > Before: > > gettimeofday: vdso: 235 nsec/call > clock-gettime-realtime: vdso: 244 nsec/call > > With the series: > > gettimeofday: vdso: 271 nsec/call > clock-gettime-realtime: vdso: 281 nsec/call Those are important, and degrade ~15%. That is acceptable IMO, but do you see a way to optimise this (later)? Anyway, excellent results, thanks for your persistence! Segher