DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Ez8jVCeIZxCo6pcM92c8ZBeHnBM6bAE57/p5Fp9zP7IfKhlYekgUIiixJ5+FrvMkuq3haOt/lLqkIxEEyI2YllPzVF+8Oarub8hNC6JvKGg6+igibb7/Ey/veCUpdUIzBwPjk+b13IKe5AI0b0wZPjoDROlnTEvryQCoa/jstkc=
Message-ID: <58cb370e0602010326k265ef278k4010df13fb5adf8c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:26:26 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] SGIIOC4 limit request size
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20060201111754.GB152005@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <yq0vevzpi8r.fsf@jaguar.mkp.net>
	 <58cb370e0602010234p62521a00h6d8920c84cac44d5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20060201104913.GA152005@sgi.com>
	 <58cb370e0602010308o4cde24aeg8d629b1b3d45cdd3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20060201111754.GB152005@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 4035
Lines: 101

On 2/1/06, Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:08:30PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On 2/1/06, Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:34:18AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On 01 Feb 2006 03:59:16 -0500, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > This one takes care of a problem with the SGI IOC4 driver where it
> > > > > hits DMA problems if the request grows too large.
> > > >
> > > > Does this happen only for CONFIG_IA64_PAGE_SIZE_4KB=y
> > > > or CONFIG_IA64_PAGE_SIZE_8KB=y?
> > >
> > > Actually, it happens with a 16KB page size.
> > >
> > > > from sgiioc4.c:
> > > >
> > > > /* Each Physical Region Descriptor Entry size is 16 bytes (2 * 64 bits) */
> > > > /* IOC4 has only 1 IDE channel */
> > > > #define IOC4_PRD_BYTES       16
> > > > #define IOC4_PRD_ENTRIES     (PAGE_SIZE /(4*IOC4_PRD_BYTES))
> > > >
> > > > As limiting request size to 127 sectors punishes performance
> > > > wouldn't it be better to define IOC4_PRD_ENTRIES to 256
> > > > if this is possible (would need 4 pages for PAGE_SIZE=4096
> > > > and 2 for PAGE_SIZE=8192)?
> > >
> > > I may be misunderstanding something, but it looks to me as though
> > > IOC4_PRD_ENTRIES may be ignored, since ide_init_queue() just uses
> > > PRD_ENTRIES.  Fortunately, with a 16KB page size, the arithmetic
> > > works out to the same.  In any case, it seems that the 64KB
> > > limit is the problem.  Whether that is due to too many s/g entries
> >
> > Indeed, seems that hwif->max_sg_nents is not respected when
> > setting queue ->max_hw_segments and ->max_phys_segments.
> >
> > Does the logic really work the same?
> > Isn't PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS == 0 for SN2?
> >
> > If so then the code sets ->max_{hw,phys}_segments
> > to IOC4_PRD_ENTRIES/2 which actually shouldn't hurt...
> >
> > > or total byte count I cannot say.  I do know that with a 2KB
> > > physical sector size, the minimum size for a s/g entry should be
> > > 2KB, which would mean we're using at most 32 with 127 max sectors --
> > > well below the 256 that we get from PRD_ENTRIES and IOC4_PRD_ENTRIES.
> > >
> > > We're still looking for root cause of this problem.  But with the
> > > default 128KB max request size, we occasionally get timeouts on
> > > DMA commands.
> >
> > I have no big problem with applying patch as it is but I think that
> > it just hides the real problem and/or makes it harder to hit...
> >
> > Bartlomiej
>
> I agree.  I think I found the real problem.
>
> I'm going to test it and sleep on it, but here is the correct patch,
> I think.  Hot off the press.
>
> Give us 16 hours  :-)

:-)

> The problem was that the chip actually likes a count of 0x10000 for
> a 64K s/g, but the original author programmed 0 instead of 0x10000
> for that amount (I don't know why).

original BM-DMA interprets 0 as 64K since length field is limited to 16-bits

> I'll send a better patch tomorrow.  This one depends on a byte count
> multiple of 2.  Though according to the chip docs, it ignores bit 0
> of the byte count anyway (and the address for that matter).  So I
> think this is functionally correct.  But I think the xcount variable
> is superfluous.

it seems so

> jeremy
>
>
> --- a/linux/drivers/ide/pci/sgiioc4.c   2006-02-01 03:13:40.000000000 -0800
> +++ b/linux/drivers/ide/pci/sgiioc4.c   2006-02-01 03:02:18.144450010 -0800
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@
>                                 *table = 0x0;
>                                 table++;
>
> -                               xcount = bcount & 0xffff;
> +                               xcount = ((bcount - 1) & 0xffff) + 1;
>                                 *table = cpu_to_be32(xcount);
>                                 table++;
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/