Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932423AbWBAMLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:11:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932425AbWBAMLL (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:11:11 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:21938 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932423AbWBAMLK (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:11:10 -0500 Message-ID: <43E0A55C.6020700@renninger.de> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:11:08 +0100 From: Thomas Renninger User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree References: <200601312112.k0VLCRdV031988@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20060131223115.GF29937@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060131223115.GF29937@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1630 Lines: 52 Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:14:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > The patch titled > > > > cpufreq: _PPC frequency change issues - freq already lowered by BIOS > > > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is > > > > cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch > > > > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find > > out what to do about this > > > > *puzzled look* > > I merged this into cpufreq-git last week. > > diff-tree 0961dd0... (from c70ca00...) > Author: Thomas Renninger > Date: Thu Jan 26 18:46:33 2006 +0100 > > [CPUFREQ] _PPC frequency change issues > > > > Did your pull fail for some reason? > > Dave I got this answer from Andrew, maybe he also picked up the patch from cpufreq list?: ____________ This generates 100% rejects against the current cpufreq tree. I'd suggest that you prepare patches against latest -mm, which includes git-cpufreq.patch. Please also include the required Signed-off-by: tags, as per section 11 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches. ____________ The patch needs a (!policy->cur) check for some cpufreq drivers, shall I resend the whole patch with this one added or is the "ontop" patch I answered to avuton@gmail.com (Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4) enough? Thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/