Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3699758ybl; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:35:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1l4hKg9H/QHCQ4E5vI9MrhyEVnzmN29XV86Kx6gPhDvixlPZthoITw38nuGkn/Dg1YEac X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7586:: with SMTP id s6mr3552472otk.342.1579613748794; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:35:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579613748; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=I8VBjZvCE8Bzfe7YN/vFEeJVZ6G5fDvg0pvMhhT8qTaZhJS1gUS/LNwExT3uJoNY53 SSR/MAUk1gJx4iNSDADx74Nf/tAjmSmoSyDaXS9SDXP5HJvNr0E837Z5/nt9GPHO0ZYZ 8iazlQeRa8RS9IBKBMBmC+JuBtNWlLXB53Y9rTlljrVbeb72Mn5+y0wzU/6egtRyEzsm N2iKv37LlwA9R95TKshVEIqD5UwikceBJbmSHjH8sx30sgCl7JqPYY1GK9xc/TTe0jYd KYFsYa3COiuGE/tK3PscT/qR7V1FuSSGttzlmkppRGNyJgcLAUfZdindscscEw2fODcZ Ncnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject; bh=tenTV9U1Ps7nunxxpnhd5k2hoQvKrW2PdzxNmqQ+s40=; b=pYBTfug1EYID46eamZXAWR2+egPC73z50NeMqohry1NDU7PE47FeSe6sqXRaiFG2AW LhKVEsQsdQ8l5ZK5gpATkzQ/xa7Bo5x6hY/vfWHo+edBZNoJLq6+8YenMfAqkeIe0NTD zktApm+vrXKb/uIOqNXmZjUNHy3S4Gf+GgUiWT7YnxLInq8VJx6LoV1SRdTkWGjJD8U4 2S5QDFCHn9u38kjLFh84DNyubNdwRG0AFKFqLPLrzpDphYBwyWWPLpa+qvnt4bs7CGkt pDoA3vDOAFaC27FdWZsA1EI3IU7OGESxmB1Kz22LXw2QY6k49ryaHTzHKYBU272EB81/ mNCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e3si23058599otp.286.2020.01.21.05.35.36; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:35:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728792AbgAUNel (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:34:41 -0500 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:34688 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726920AbgAUNel (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:34:41 -0500 Received: from dhcp-172-16-24-104.sw.ru ([172.16.24.104]) by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1ittfD-0007u7-5X; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:33:51 +0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] dm: Directly disable max_allocate_sectors for now From: Kirill Tkhai To: Mike Snitzer Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, bob.liu@oracle.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, osandov@fb.com, jthumshirn@suse.de, minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com, damien.lemoal@wdc.com, andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com, hare@suse.com, tj@kernel.org, ajay.joshi@wdc.com, sagi@grimberg.me, dsterba@suse.com, bvanassche@acm.org, dhowells@redhat.com, asml.silence@gmail.com References: <157960325642.108120.13626623438131044304.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <157960337238.108120.18048939587162465175.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20200121122458.GA9365@redhat.com> Message-ID: <619a7a14-44e6-eca7-c1ea-3f04abeee53d@virtuozzo.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:33:50 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21.01.2020 15:36, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > On 21.01.2020 15:24, Mike Snitzer wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 21 2020 at 5:42am -0500, >> Kirill Tkhai wrote: >> >>> Since dm inherits limits from underlining block devices, >>> this patch directly disables max_allocate_sectors for dm >>> till full allocation support is implemented. >>> >>> This prevents high-level primitives (generic_make_request_checks(), >>> __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(), ...) from sending REQ_ALLOCATE >>> requests. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai >>> --- >>> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 2 ++ >>> drivers/md/md.h | 1 + >>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> You're mixing DM and MD changes in the same patch. >> >> But I'm wondering if it might be best to set this default for stacking >> devices in blk_set_stacking_limits()? >> >> And then it is up to each stacking driver to override as needed. > > Hm. Sound like a good idea. This "lim->max_allocate_sectors = 0" in blk_set_stacking_limits() > should work for dm's dm_calculate_queue_limits(), since it calls blk_stack_limits(), which is: > > t->max_allocate_sectors = min(t->max_allocate_sectors, > b->max_allocate_sectors); > > Could you please tell is this fix is also enough for md? It looks like it's enough since queue defaults are set in md_alloc()->blk_set_stacking_limits(). In case of we set "max_allocate_sectors = 0", in further it can be changed only manually, but nobody does this.