Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3825643ybl; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:43:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxW8vcvGGjRP/MS1RgqPuzTD0J4UnRULNj0UTPmiZ/0lMbxb3i9ph+AgbdVKMMHJ2H5mxKt X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:15ca:: with SMTP id j10mr4131446otr.190.1579621436352; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:43:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579621436; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OM4ijuIZh/O0ZK27ALCSlDyocFhJwkICdXuiChidUB5Rec9Bv6XtJ+I/E07pN6aPJr hMY661qhioQHdkJXSAlaobTOOLNXWvFI0Eb1S+Z7TUXky8mHOruHqbT4/7/F+jwVt4bm UvYa6oe3lGJGTqaFd7zWwvHPd9SFQ2X7HkM/tCAslSA3IOL32q/w8Dra4D58MUnSCM5l ITlrf79DbtSANb0id7ZKnwfzkGYefVtLeTQNsMsxB2C9Xn34XwgP5DtS6XZ0UnW6rVYR hPQ3QD+OUumVnTzXLhqPfkqZojzF8MSlTmavcQHzlby+tM0g/PZOcvvATuFYNWxO3xEz G6Ew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=LqlaydX8NNZ8GDOJHbZOH2luNKjSXR3q0RkPFHU3yH4=; b=CbhaKnBY/M7YkkCfcmxXf4BGvwXIQ0ENT+MXP1wolT0LeqBPIpFEj6ZEdGWMtMwqjB Nj+MFCa6e5NkhJU48T8TVFraS22LDboog06mcQeAyhoftILgL7/CD/2uSDwOXuH7JF7w rZYnO/2cuyXJivQ8n0BfnReniPNzEoo78InWS0hoscpiqlb/HUxRBpiI05sIuT8K8Jos MOc260cvlFS2EUQjkAaVGJ9I13XUP9uluIUBalbbsRenKTNZ/2YA/DajTTtZWyRlEbdj mMaZOvPoA3KmIYbatXeFlVnRDY3q+Ql9GMrok5mFlXxaFmmNmpBcTJ9n8Yvp6WZepFHA 5utQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="x/tQI8lJ"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b145si19761932oii.67.2020.01.21.07.43.44; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:43:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="x/tQI8lJ"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729096AbgAUPms (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:42:48 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34778 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727817AbgAUPmr (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:42:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAEC6207E0; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:42:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579621367; bh=XFxVdvoPAuJ1iwI987V6w4EhmdrR0YxBJZYSGNu2ljE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=x/tQI8lJofEWRICGoADMClZDO4s5h3meL46SM30o72NslG0+c00XU00B5a4sfczEG Yp/NiX5Ao0K38QGigKcNMhNqgh5tsF6ALo9iLinCiB1LVr260lX5hHdk9ZWWWh6Mu3 fmCtibKLMFcllf39Ri4O5GzPkuJ4HiAFosZXjVPY= Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:42:45 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Zhenzhong Duan , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Question about dynamic minor number of misc device Message-ID: <20200121154245.GB588670@kroah.com> References: <20200120221323.GJ15860@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120221323.GJ15860@mit.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:13:23PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > - FLASH_MINOR move and rename to avoid conflict > > - change speakup to dynamic minors > > - support for high dynamic minor numbers if you are really motivated > > (probably nobody needs these) > > Are we sure that reassigning minor device number conflits isn't going > to break systems? Especially those on random, older, architectures > they might not be using udev. Note, I do not think udev has been in charge of creating /dev/ nodes for well over 10 years now, that is up to devtmpfs. thanks, greg k-h