Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:28:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:28:32 -0400 Received: from curlew.cs.man.ac.uk ([130.88.13.7]:40965 "EHLO curlew.cs.man.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:28:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:28:51 +0100 From: John Levon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM Message-ID: <20011016132851.B74778@compsoc.man.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20011015211216.A1314@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i X-Url: http://www.movement.uklinux.net/ X-Record: Truant - Neither Work Nor Leisure X-Toppers: N/A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 05:53:32PM -0700, David Lang wrote: > before switching my production machines from 2.4.5 to a newer kernel. running such an old kernel does not give a fair comparison. Personally I've found the /current/ ac VM to be stable and give slightly smoother feel than the linus tree VM. regards john -- "I hear you have four hundred and eighty six PCs for sale ?" - Some Fool - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/