Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:34:46 -0800
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To:     Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        rnayak@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for pm6150 and
 pm6150l
Message-ID: <20200121193446.GU89495@google.com>
References: <1572931309-16250-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org>
 <5dc1cb4c.1c69fb81.af253.0b8a@mx.google.com>
 <c4cee81775c6d82024ca05250290f603@codeaurora.org>
 <5dc2f71e.1c69fb81.8912a.f2c0@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5dc2f71e.1c69fb81.8912a.f2c0@mx.google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Kiran,

What is the status of this patch? It has outstanding comments and I
couldn't find a later version. Do you plan to post a v3 in the near
future?

Thanks

Matthias

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 08:38:53AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting kgunda@codeaurora.org (2019-11-05 22:43:59)
> > On 2019-11-06 00:49, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Kiran Gunda (2019-11-04 21:21:49)
> > >> Add the compatibles and PMIC ids for pm6150 and pm6150l PMICs
> > >> found on SC7180 based platforms.
> > >> 
> > >> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>  - Changes from V1:
> > >>    Sorted the macros and compatibles.
> > > 
> > > I don't see anything sorted though.
> > > 
> > Sorry .. I might have misunderstood your comment. Let me know if my 
> > understanding is correct.
> > 
> > >>>> And compatible here.
> > >>> And on macro name here.
> > 
> > This means you want to sort all the existing compatible and macros in 
> > alpha numeric order ?
> 
> Sorry I also got confused on what the driver is doing. I replied on the
> original patch with what is preferred.
>