Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4136952ybl; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:38:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyOq4THNNipTbCCs+zEuKcoz35hoQ97LQq5axt9KHhlKHNAufnirsOLT7G0JYrLHxfDjaYs X-Received: by 2002:aca:e146:: with SMTP id y67mr4379071oig.93.1579642694729; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:38:14 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579642694; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tkRdQv5Vz0n8QRHZtys0PrTLdabcY61lNqKDL4Gunw0EWOo7GpvgRvTDVg6uk22HmW BSoVAb8aTRKZ6oDHmus3MOe6dvLNRMAzdpuyAvO65Q0KqHoQY4WcnIgnKPhUkac8Iilj OMS+sUtxdhbHF/LcT1nyaprTjFB53IskMRVQC4GKaXrAJUibrWxQJ7HJvbIg6gptEMib xP7mETL6URd3kpLot+ZikUBUWPwCFIhamxka90jCRCCJGKuOsWe4BB+IcqIq175KvxJa RDHAsA2u7IF6eh8lgvyF5imDqxamEahTOXYgkDP8jpYhaBlVGc8cR8m6wPL/mct/0v3s MPsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=8b+80/5WVCJoUAz9P663abPMKvvURI3u8sjX5XmAfiE=; b=MJTokuSPilvP54pbhH0caF4ICjywajN9sQiVOWE5AU9OViOEneSpnBGk+AHt7t3prj Znwfa9cWZHwyd1IIxaLd9ginbdKA0EjaayRiGacC5/v0pIj5SYhtAiIbxul0ZfDuiPpv HsV1z/CFcbPK1xZxHSpKoftKhIOcKVF/IDAz/1qjAAyeKlcfSgHjKoOHGlglCTslxPaY amLLfDFW67/Nzfmy9xZ1TKKQsPwqFzBGoqL70dVzJ3V0wWyNs0VFVIm2BSVj9NHG4cvC INvX8782Ug+fWsF3Uuuk9LD88bZ8Z2s6PckJ+HfBhczcHenYjQKM0F1Fo/pgUw/4jZEL SeoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si23692897otp.22.2020.01.21.13.38.02; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:38:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729180AbgAUVgd (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:36:33 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:52534 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728827AbgAUVgd (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:36:33 -0500 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iu1CD-000GVs-Iq; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:36:26 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:36:25 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Namjae Jeon , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Subject: Re: vfat: Broken case-insensitive support for UTF-8 Message-ID: <20200121213625.GB23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200119221455.bac7dc55g56q2l4r@pali> <87sgkan57p.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <20200120110438.ak7jpyy66clx5v6x@pali> <875zh6pc0f.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <20200120214046.f6uq7rlih7diqahz@pali> <20200120224625.GE8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200120235745.hzza3fkehlmw5s45@pali> <20200121000701.GG8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200121203405.7g7gisb3q55u2y2f@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200121203405.7g7gisb3q55u2y2f@pali> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:34:05PM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote: > This is a great idea to get FAT equivalence classes. Thank you! > > Now I quickly tried it... and it failed. FAT has restriction for number > of files in a directory, so I would have to do it in more clever way, > e.g prepare N directories and then try to create/open file for each > single-point string in every directory until it success or fail in every > one. IIRC, the limitation in root directory was much harder than in subdirectories... Not sure, though - it had been a long time since I had to touch *FAT for any reasons...