Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4167246ybl; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:17:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwWzKTINvhiMHt+yfpER2UaRWE97F7jFsXe+3L5gwbHLnJ/Up2EKID4C3vpR8GcbglB5MJB X-Received: by 2002:a9d:8f1:: with SMTP id 104mr4840590otf.107.1579645030596; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:17:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579645030; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KqulYuT67f7z4A0r3svqDkbnO6mO9A88GrVIhms0m7IGt+MMn9IP9VK+/Jg6h7akyd HSDW7YAkLM9srQrdxPPwAa7CrnHNnrd6pxFE76PNyIqNsn7HFKqwwNjLAL3EvNEYCrwc 5jH6lIVhGu5Nqstd5eObFIez9lLFM9UybguDi5cgDVAbUHn0uBZXshUIuYr2F2RO4C42 kiV2mznwYZUOcuZ1x7E7dKsfkJyFH3TxTZcVdWI242XvfIBbf535DMUGqO9LEDqBoOHC ZnHSeRIy4XqBjjuGbWLVonIO95lk8AILkDtsxx9YeNrmA/rUASFVNlkYd1WmFDZOGF/x FDeQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=1Pq8sNSVd5f7InS8PifrfRjzX/40bZG3KQ9l6k7rpbU=; b=KF3o4JrnXtFFvECs7RWFwvz1AY8IcRXVxOuYIIPO+n1EMIZ8g8ETJQ5xUIH0wHQGGu b1W1PwUTJtS2R/o/H4M6oZgRz5WTYnmHETCA11/w2eBkHtb/m16JKfv0nyLiSWu3JGhG fPKP489pNmpZyrkhWgszIdLSvAV/XNn1fC8TLMVL5UhyvJcsJK/ddjrY4zVQk6yhGASM BnQyZRhZ5wKArJDXgjXExZtNqyPM6Msbj3XfPBd9v0LawRc9waGVgBzuIp+UiNQcRZea tAoSwck1WTsdpVXkboaCGldmuxR1SwA6JIWR7qchoQ4pvMqDeu7Ywp63/ULwsTY6sRgn KCJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q126si20647260oia.8.2020.01.21.14.16.58; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:17:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728894AbgAUWOv (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:14:51 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:53156 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728139AbgAUWOv (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:14:51 -0500 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iu1nL-000IWy-7c; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:14:47 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:14:47 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Namjae Jeon , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Subject: Re: vfat: Broken case-insensitive support for UTF-8 Message-ID: <20200121221447.GD23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200119221455.bac7dc55g56q2l4r@pali> <87sgkan57p.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <20200120110438.ak7jpyy66clx5v6x@pali> <875zh6pc0f.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <20200120214046.f6uq7rlih7diqahz@pali> <20200120224625.GE8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200120235745.hzza3fkehlmw5s45@pali> <20200121000701.GG8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200121203405.7g7gisb3q55u2y2f@pali> <20200121213625.GB23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200121213625.GB23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:36:25PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:34:05PM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > > This is a great idea to get FAT equivalence classes. Thank you! > > > > Now I quickly tried it... and it failed. FAT has restriction for number > > of files in a directory, so I would have to do it in more clever way, > > e.g prepare N directories and then try to create/open file for each > > single-point string in every directory until it success or fail in every > > one. > > IIRC, the limitation in root directory was much harder than in > subdirectories... Not sure, though - it had been a long time since > I had to touch *FAT for any reasons... Interesting... FWIW, Linux vfat happily creates 65536 files in root directory. What are the native limits?