Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276118AbRJPMhe>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:37:34 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276052AbRJPMhZ>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:37:25 -0400
Received: from as2-1-8.va.g.bonet.se ([194.236.117.122]:53256 "EHLO
	boris.prodako.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S276118AbRJPMhJ>;
	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:37:09 -0400
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:34:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tobias Ringstrom <tori@ringstrom.mine.nu>
X-X-Sender: <tori@boris.prodako.se>
To: John Levon <moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VM
In-Reply-To: <20011016132851.B74778@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110161433180.13792-100000@boris.prodako.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, John Levon wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 05:53:32PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> 
> > before switching my production machines from 2.4.5 to a newer kernel.
> 
> running such an old kernel does not give a fair comparison. Personally I've
> found the /current/ ac VM to be stable and give slightly smoother feel than
> the linus tree VM.

Are you comparing with post 2.4.10 Linus kernels?

/Tobias

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/