Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4288258ybl; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:01:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgkG7JIbpFcfacKFes2PpozsFkjlGd5/OpN0QeOvuRI8dTv0FBrNq8tn7s5DmReiZbjJTP X-Received: by 2002:aca:d0c:: with SMTP id 12mr5216340oin.26.1579654886249; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:01:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579654886; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MLlRm3mWetqHR3wajPcVwtY9fcdpE8x7OljlCynICgCxHm8UNI2GVRGS0XbAsDhJoR tx6AzdoPgkwT1OTgdyd4hb8jkzecnhUvFG400hNNRYCfliq/TBCTVufa4NYa3ZmyKZgM zjcfeXr2M+DDrMbuQ8gPtmVOV5/Y4emfBLbuI2EUcZ7W8RYlnZ++Ivu9v+HeVKaHVNaT GdUasWQw46TQKh5UitLl+KX+ooLwh/ePNHe2JO3NUudZ+VaEbu75UumZsdWMUXfZp6Nq q+kBueW43NeHPP1Tc0HHFdlCf8kcU+bJYmwffoZlp1TP+z1tfw0JBtgYHY7O6jgRYUiq Y0tg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=RhpxjFqw4L2dDQfhqK+UawU3JBzFhLSJ7WMYzM3dBEM=; b=Gwfk5YPzRR6QzycrerBQGIoBn/DYxmGgsFhP3hXMCBpot0bRWp/mdUoj5KtOVf86j5 C0QW4+QVvoLuosY/U+gX1uPZezCw2xHWr3lXrKBcbrVzqZEYZynxadL9ikYq9FlA1mnF JlKojag32ne035J7ugrGQV2PI4gXH35yPdb+0c4P4Psapj27N5wtXK9q3l0iEudB5Q4T Xnd8kI+ABuoEd6BIx6kW7Kuww7FTTGYEXSj6b8f8cPvDbnJhjW6sTOD2DNJmSQ1n1MZV 29ADB3QJPMDTf2/Z+/c9+IvtmqBHfF7+7PGmGTr2FaRIiiV4TE0zy8YBDQa9OpSY3jiF e5CA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q7si20881901otn.108.2020.01.21.17.01.13; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:01:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728853AbgAVBAP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:00:15 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:61932 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728609AbgAVBAP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:00:15 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jan 2020 17:00:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,347,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="229081543" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2020 17:00:13 -0800 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:00:24 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Wei Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com Subject: Re: [Patch v2 4/4] mm/page_alloc.c: extract commom part to check page Message-ID: <20200122010024.GF11409@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20200120030415.15925-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20200120030415.15925-5-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <3987ae0f-cbfc-1066-c78f-c5c6efc570ed@arm.com> <20200120123621.GE18028@richard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:19:38AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > >On 01/20/2020 06:06 PM, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 12:13:38PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/20/2020 08:34 AM, Wei Yang wrote: >>>> During free and new page, we did some check on the status of page >>>> struct. There is some common part, just extract them. >>> >>> Makes sense. >>> >>>> >>>> Besides this, this patch also rename two functions to keep the name >>>> convention, since free_pages_check_bad/free_pages_check are counterparts >>>> of check_new_page_bad/check_new_page. >>> >>> This probably should be in a different patch. >>> >> >> In v1, they are in two separate patches. While David Suggest to merge it. >> >> I am not sure whether my understanding is correct. > >Keeping code refactoring and renaming separate is always better >but its okay, will leave it upto you. > Agree with you :-) Maybe I misunderstand David. Will split it in next version. -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me