Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964942AbWBAQP4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964982AbWBAQP4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:11728 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964942AbWBAQPz (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:15:41 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: more cfq spinlock badness Message-ID: <20060201161541.GD5875@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Jens Axboe , Linux Kernel References: <20060131063938.GA1876@redhat.com> <20060131090944.GU4215@suse.de> <20060131173601.GA7204@redhat.com> <20060201110228.GS4215@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060201110228.GS4215@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 898 Lines: 25 On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:02:28PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > if you are using that? The bug above has in the > > > past always been able to be explained by a driver destroying a structure > > > embedding the queue lock before the queue is dead. > > > > as there were no ub devices plugged in at the time, I think > > Pete is off the hook for this one. > > The ub fix hasn't been merged yet. Really? I thought Pete synced up a whole bunch of ub bits including that already. > Just trying to be absolutely certain > that you didn't have that loaded? 99.9% sure. (It was a few days ago, and I'm already forgetting details). Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/