Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4742047ybl; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:56:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZc0WngaZLqXLTHbDteTdPN9jwRJJFu9ntILqceKTy3PqBKsAr66DOyeid88LHUNEBclpE X-Received: by 2002:aca:4fc2:: with SMTP id d185mr6632942oib.33.1579694192313; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:56:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579694192; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Uj323qcjQhzxBoSdUB2I7RzStrSBNZ5VQA6vHfaJRop3HjPgJ4bOF3IOUmj6L8pPCz bTFHZqDCOUJZfmH7Ac/7wwodtPtFal1nYNNc9AJsszyzsnLzpwafsrfHXIfQPIrcnnnS mmrk8J5ZCwfHisVxMb7vRwvA24MOO7Gq9x4/g6bjUSMsLxD3eMxqKzHAMI/EEpH3ABZk 3myGupqHZAod+rcF4xq5oUO/NdtFbHWnszlMlx238ScIZ4LRgdEGDq2suPeYaAEedJRp N5L9Z7MCVCfajR7PuJxPyBvDnpOFczBJTYorMe2rd7Is+UdZpkMMz63S/RcH59nUmXU8 uV+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=K18iBg2qFzcf2Or0yI1Kno1MCyG0o9JqcfOJ8UQkygI=; b=T5MwY/eMggEKD3ci0I65BnEhXf7o5lCFF8uWOf5Q6Lw9elEgKhWF1HCNDZafZrgj7/ 4/YERu/hXI+guQkpTGwh7+NJZAIVzzBloF/jU9wHSzxJUclBcymryGgZCMWrGPS/gyFw rVmAt2pUycnUhhebpi1UN7MuzseaQD4BXMPor8F94LXLM4GmzeXMIl3T6EKkXE4nqZ4l lpbDMpZSVc46mGK1xo3m4wgiOHpjAMo7Uulf74GNwkjIUBq79RLUcjV7XXS6qj5xbveW 9uMfjPbt6hDASDFeMmm3VvnD8pPPDeFukzOLgzPzfi4kfygJZNsM4VXm4ipJ/PmcLOXY IUvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x11si20569004oic.185.2020.01.22.03.56.18; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:56:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728939AbgAVLzV (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:55:21 -0500 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:60634 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726094AbgAVLzU (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:55:20 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: aragua) with ESMTPSA id C6214293996 Message-ID: <65bff5ebbc7c463003896f6f931e87ae3d8c83ae.camel@collabora.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd / platform: cros_ec: Query EC protocol version if EC transitions between RO/RW From: Fabien Lahoudere To: Yicheng Li Cc: Yicheng Li , LKML , Benson Leung , Gwendal Grignou , Enric Balletbo i Serra Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:55:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20191118200000.35484-1-yichengli@chromium.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, With the patch applied, root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp reboot_ec ioctl -1, errno 110 (Connection timed out), EC result 255 () root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp version RO version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e RW version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e Firmware copy: RW Build info: nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e 2019-11-01 20:30:58 @chromeos-ci-legacy-us-central1-b-x32-72-dltd Tool version: v2.0.3074-a5052d4e7 2020-01-16 10:23:05 debian@debian in that case we see that the firmware copy is RW after the reboot. Without the patch : root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp reboot_ec ioctl -1, errno 110 (Connection timed out), EC result 255 () root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp version RO version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e RW version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e Firmware copy: RO Build info: nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e 2018-10-01 19:11:56 @cros-beefy532-c2 Tool version: v2.0.3074-a5052d4e7 2020-01-16 10:23:05 debian@debian root@debian:/src/ec# The firmware copy stays RO For me the patch works fine Tested-by: Fabien Lahoudere Thanks Le mardi 21 janvier 2020 à 10:13 -0800, Yicheng Li a écrit : > Hi Fabien, > > error 4 is EC_RES_ACCESS_DENIED. I think it's because you are trying > to directly reboot to RO, which issues the command EC_CMD_REBOOT_EC > (0xD2) > https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/15edeaabe90c554d83faa4ff0c9143c66248e0e4/common/system.c#1495 > and is ultimately disallowed since system_is_locked() is true: > https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/15edeaabe90c554d83faa4ff0c9143c66248e0e4/common/system.c#551 > > The way I test it is to run "ectool --name=cros_fp reboot_ec" without > the "RO" argument. This issues EC_CMD_REBOOT > https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/15edeaabe90c554d83faa4ff0c9143c66248e0e4/util/ectool.c#1055 > which is 0xD1. (Sorry I didn't notice the RO argument in the first > pass...) > > With "ectool --name=cros_fp reboot_ec", we are telling cros_fp to do > an immediate reboot (to RW), however because of the issue outlined in > the commit description, it would hang in RO without this patch. > > Thanks, > Yicheng > > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 3:16 AM Fabien Lahoudere < > fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com> wrote: > > Hi Yicheng, > > > > Thanks for your quick answer. > > > > I updated the firmware after my first email on friday. > > Now the version is correct: > > > > # ectool version --name=cros_fp > > RO version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e > > RW version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e > > Firmware copy: RW > > Build info: nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e 2019-11-01 > > 20:30:58 > > @chromeos-ci-legacy-us-central1-b-x32-72-dltd > > Tool version: v2.0.3031-9e0f24fad 2020-01-13 06:11:02 > > @chromeos-ci- > > legacy-us-east1-d-x32-89-i09h > > > > The result does not change. This is the console output after I sent > > the > > reboot command. > > > > $ ectool name=cros_fp output > > ... > > [250664.176204 HC 0xa9] > > [250664.176287 HC 0xa9 err 1] > > [250664.177413 HC 0x67] > > [250664.177489 HC 0x67 err 9] > > [250664.178434 HC 0x02] > > [250664.180308 HC Suppressed: 0x97=127 0x98=138 0x115=0] > > [250664.477987 HC 0x01] > > [250892.898421 HC 0x02] > > [250892.900447 HC 0x07] > > [250892.901286 HC 0x0b] > > [250902.139053 HC 0x02] > > [250902.141059 HC 0x07] > > [250902.141847 HC 0x0b] > > [250902.142988 HC 0xd2] > > [250902.143072 Executing host reboot command 1] > > [250902.143176 HC 0xd2 err 4] > > [250908.838254 HC 0x02] > > [250908.840474 HC 0x07] > > [250908.841391 HC 0x0b] > > > > it seems we have an error when executing the 0zd2 command. > > > > Any idea what is error 4? > > > > Thanks > > > > Fabien > > > > Le jeudi 16 janvier 2020 à 05:04 -0800, Yicheng Li a écrit : > > > Hi Fabien, > > > > > > First, you need the new firmware which has RW 2.2.191 instead of > > > 2.2.110. It's available in release M80. The old firmware you were > > > using does not have the RO/RW protocol incompatibility problem > > > because RW 2.2.110 still only support versions 0 and 1 of > > > EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_EVENT, same as RO 2.2.64. RW 2.2.191 has version > > 2 of > > > EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_ EVENT, hence the issue described in the commit > > > message. > > > > > > With RW 2.2.191, if the kernal does not have this patch, > > rebooting > > > cros_fp will leave you in an infinite loop in RO, as described in > > the > > > commit message. This patch solves the problem and you should be > > in RW > > > after the reboot. You can see more details on the commands sent > > to > > > cros_fp during RO if you have cros_fp.log > > > > > > Let me know if you have other questions. Thanks! > > > > > > Best, > > > Yicheng > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 4:27 AM Fabien Lahoudere < > > > fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I tried to test that patch but I cannot switch to RO firmware. > > > > I do the following steps: > > > > > > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp# cat version > > > > RO version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e > > > > RW version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c > > > > Firmware copy: RW > > > > Build info: nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c 2018-11-02 > > 14:16:46 > > > > @swarm-cros-461 > > > > Chip vendor: stm > > > > Chip name: stm32h7x3 > > > > Chip revision: > > > > Board version: EC error 1 > > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp# echo ro > reboot > > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp# cat version > > > > RO version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e > > > > RW version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c > > > > Firmware copy: RW > > > > Build info: nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c 2018-11-02 > > 14:16:46 > > > > @swarm-cros-461 > > > > Chip vendor: stm > > > > Chip name: stm32h7x3 > > > > Chip revision: > > > > Board version: EC error 1 > > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp# > > > > > > > > We see here that cros_fp is still RW. > > > > > > > > I also tried with: > > > > > > > > debian@debian:/src/ec$ sudo build/bds/util/ectool -- > > name=cros_fp > > > > reboot_ec RO > > > > debian@debian:/src/ec$ sudo build/bds/util/ectool -- > > name=cros_fp > > > > version > > > > RO version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e > > > > RW version: nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c > > > > Firmware copy: RW > > > > Build info: nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c 2018-11-02 > > 14:16:46 > > > > @swarm-cros-461 > > > > Tool version: v2.0.3074-a5052d4e7 2020-01-16 10:23:05 > > > > debian@debian > > > > debian@debian:/src/ec$ > > > > > > > > with the same result. > > > > > > > > Can you decribe us steps you follow to test that patch? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Fabien > > > > > > > > Le lundi 18 novembre 2019 à 12:00 -0800, Yicheng Li a écrit : > > > > > RO and RW of EC may have different EC protocol version. If EC > > > > > transitions > > > > > between RO and RW, but AP does not reboot (this is true for > > > > > fingerprint > > > > > microcontroller / cros_fp, but not true for main ec / > > cros_ec), > > > > the > > > > > AP > > > > > still uses the protocol version queried before transition, > > which > > > > can > > > > > cause problems. In the case of fingerprint microcontroller, > > this > > > > > causes > > > > > AP to send the wrong version of EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_EVENT to RO > > in > > > > the > > > > > interrupt handler, which in turn prevents RO to clear the > > > > interrupt > > > > > line to AP, in an infinite loop. > > > > > > > > > > Once an EC_HOST_EVENT_INTERFACE_READY is received, we know > > that > > > > there > > > > > might have been a transition between RO and RW, so re-query > > the > > > > > protocol. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yicheng Li > > > > > > > > > > Change-Id: Ib58032ff4a8e113bdbd07212e8aff42807afff38 > > > > > Series-to: LKML > > > > > Series-cc: Benson Leung , Enric Balletbo > > i > > > > Serra > > > > > , Gwendal Grignou < > > > > gwendal@chromium.org > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c | 24 > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h | 1 + > > > > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c > > > > > b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c > > > > > index 9b2d07422e17..0c910846d99d 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c > > > > > @@ -104,6 +104,23 @@ static int cros_ec_sleep_event(struct > > > > > cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 sleep_event) > > > > > return ret; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > +static int cros_ec_ready_event(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > > > + unsigned long queued_during_suspend, void *_notify) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = container_of(nb, struct > > > > > cros_ec_device, > > > > > + > > > > notifier_ready); > > > > > + u32 host_event = cros_ec_get_host_event(ec_dev); > > > > > + > > > > > + if (host_event & > > > > > EC_HOST_EVENT_MASK(EC_HOST_EVENT_INTERFACE_READY)) { > > > > > + mutex_lock(&ec_dev->lock); > > > > > + cros_ec_query_all(ec_dev); > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&ec_dev->lock); > > > > > + return NOTIFY_OK; > > > > > + } else { > > > > > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > > > > > + } > > > > > +} > > > > > + > > > > > /** > > > > > * cros_ec_register() - Register a new ChromeOS EC, using > > the > > > > > provided info. > > > > > * @ec_dev: Device to register. > > > > > @@ -201,6 +218,13 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct > > cros_ec_device > > > > > *ec_dev) > > > > > dev_dbg(ec_dev->dev, "Error %d clearing sleep > > event > > > > to > > > > > ec", > > > > > err); > > > > > > > > > > + /* Register the notifier for > > EC_HOST_EVENT_INTERFACE_READY > > > > > event. */ > > > > > + ec_dev->notifier_ready.notifier_call = > > cros_ec_ready_event; > > > > > + err = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&ec_dev- > > > > >event_notifier, > > > > > + &ec_dev- > > > > > >notifier_ready); > > > > > + if (err < 0) > > > > > + dev_warn(ec_dev->dev, "Failed to register > > > > notifier\n"); > > > > > + > > > > > dev_info(dev, "Chrome EC device registered\n"); > > > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h > > > > > b/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h > > > > > index 0d4e4aaed37a..9840408c0b01 100644 > > > > > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h > > > > > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct cros_ec_device { > > > > > int event_size; > > > > > u32 host_event_wake_mask; > > > > > u32 last_resume_result; > > > > > + struct notifier_block notifier_ready; > > > > > > > > > > /* The platform devices used by the mfd driver */ > > > > > struct platform_device *ec; > > > > > >